Literature DB >> 8708275

A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations.

K F Leinfelder1.   

Abstract

Composite resins have changed the nature of dental restorations. However, many dentists have not altered their cavity preparation process, relying largely on the same procedure used for amalgam restorations. The author proposes a more conservative procedure, retaining more sound tooth structure, for placing posterior composite resin restorations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8708275     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  5 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of microleakage in primary teeth restored with three adhesive materials: ACTIVA™, composite resin, and resin-modified glass ionomer.

Authors:  A I Amaireh; S H Al-Jundi; H A Alshraideh
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-03-11

2.  Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  T C Fagundes; T J E Barata; E Bresciani; D F G Cefaly; M F F Jorge; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Mechanical Properties Comparing Composite Fiber Length to Amalgam.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen; Perng-Ru Liu
Journal:  J Compos       Date:  2016

4.  Effects of deformation rate variation on biaxial flexural properties of dental resin composites.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Muhammad S Zafar; Waheed M Dahri; Muhammad A Khan; Zohaib Khurshid; Shariq Najeeb
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

5.  Comparative evaluation of the bond strength of posterior composite with different cavity configurations and different liners using a two-step etch and rinse adhesive system: In vitro study.

Authors:  Tanaya Kumar; Anita Sanap; Karan Bhargava; Shalini Aggarwal; Gurupriya Kaur; Kunal Kunjir
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.