Literature DB >> 8707800

Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model.

I Kingma1, H M Toussaint, M P De Looze, J H Van Dieen.   

Abstract

The estimation of segment inertial parameters (SIPs) is an important source of error in inverse dynamic analysis. In most individual cases SIPs are derived from extrapolation of known SIPs of a certain population through regression equations (proportional models). Another well-known method is the use of mathematical approximation of the shape of human body segments combined with estimations of segment densities (geometric models). In the current study five males and five females performed four different lifting movements in the sagittal plane. A full body linked segment model was applied twice to the same data set, once using a proportional and once using a geometric anthropometric model. As a full body linked segment model is an overdetermined system of equations, four equations could be formed to test the summed effect of SIP errors on the inverse dynamic analysis. The overall performance in terms of coefficients of correlation was better for the geometric model as compared to the proportional model. When a back lifting movement was performed, the equations indicated systematic errors in the proportional model. However, when a leg lifting movement was performed, the equations indicated systematic errors in the geometric model. Therefore, analyzing only one kind of movement does not suffice to draw conclusions with respect to the reliability of an anthropometric model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8707800     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00086-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Armed against falls: the contribution of arm movements to balance recovery after tripping.

Authors:  Mirjam Pijnappels; Idsart Kingma; Daphne Wezenberg; Guus Reurink; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Methodological factors affecting joint moments estimation in clinical gait analysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Andrea Cereatti; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Silvia Fantozzi; Rita Stagni; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Amputee locomotion: determining the inertial properties of running-specific prostheses.

Authors:  Brian S Baum; Melanie P Schultz; Andrea Tian; Benjamin Shefter; Erik J Wolf; Hyun Joon Kwon; Jae Kun Shim
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Effects of reflex delays on postural control during unstable seated balance.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Jacek Cholewicki; Kumpati S Narendra
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The Effect of Prosthetic Alignment on Prosthetic and Total Leg Stiffness While Running With Simulated Running-Specific Prostheses.

Authors:  Ashley Groothuis; Han Houdijk
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-08-22

6.  Muscle Contributions to L4-5 Joint Rotational Stiffness following Sudden Trunk Flexion and Extension Perturbations.

Authors:  Joel A Cort; James P Dickey; Jim R Potvin
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2013-01-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.