Literature DB >> 8706196

Prophylaxis against the systemic hypotension induced by propofol during rapid-sequence intubation.

H el-Beheiry1, J Kim, B Milne, R Seegobin.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two prophylactic approaches against the anticipated hypotension induced by propofol during rapid-sequence intubation. Thirty-six male or female nonpremedicated ASA class I-II patients aged 21-60 yr undergoing elective outpatient surgery were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive pre-induction ephedrine sulphate (70 micrograms x kg(-1)iv), pre-induction volume loading (12 ml x kg(-1) Ringer's lactate) or no treatment. Rapid-sequence intubation with cricoid pressure was then performed with propofol (2.5 mg. x kg(-1)) and succinylcholine (1.5 mg x kg(-1). The lungs were subsequently ventilated with 0.25-0.5% isoflurane in a 2:1 N2O/O2 mixture. Vecuronium was given once neuromuscular function had recovered from the succinylcholine. Heart rate and systemic arterial blood pressure were measured non-invasively before induction, after propofol administration and every minute for ten minutes after intubation. Pre-induction volume loading prevented the hypotension observed before surgical stimulation in control and ephedrine groups. Moreover, pre-induction volume loading was not associated with increases in heart rate after intubation as was ephedrine administration. The intubating conditions were excellent to satisfactory in most patients and the overall incidence of adverse events during intubation was mainly due to pain during injection of propofol. The present study showed that preoperative volume loading is more efficacious than pre-induction administration of ephedrine sulphate in maintaining haemodynamic stability during rapid-sequence induction with propofol and succinylcholine. In addition, propofol in combination with succinylcholine provides excellent conditions for rapid-sequence intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8706196     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  8 in total

1.  Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with Cesarean section.

Authors:  R B Clark; D S Thompson; C H Thompson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The effects of thiopentone and propofol on upper airway integrity.

Authors:  K McKeating; I M Bali; J W Dundee
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Cardiovascular response to large doses of intravenous morphine in man.

Authors:  E Lowenstein; P Hallowell; F H Levine; W M Daggett; W G Austen; M B Laver
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-12-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparison of the effect of diisopropyl phenol (ICI 35, 868) and thiopentone on response to somatic pain.

Authors:  L P Briggs; J W Dundee; M Bahar; R S Clarke
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Hemodynamic effects of propofol: data from over 25,000 patients.

Authors:  C C Hug; C H McLeskey; M L Nahrwold; M F Roizen; T H Stanley; R A Thisted; C A Walawander; P F White; J L Apfelbaum; T H Grasela
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Comparison of propofol with methohexital for outpatient anesthesia.

Authors:  V A Doze; L M Westphal; P F White
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  A comparison of propofol and thiopentone as induction agents in outpatient surgery.

Authors:  G Edelist
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Intraocular pressure changes during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and thiopentone in combination with vecuronium.

Authors:  R K Mirakhur; W F Shepherd; P Elliott
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.166

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Prevention of hypotension after propofol for rapid sequence intubation.

Authors:  T Gin
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Reply.

Authors:  Hossam El-Beheiry
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  The impact of fluid optimisation before induction of anaesthesia on hypotension after induction.

Authors:  A I Khan; M Fischer; A C Pedoto; K Seier; K S Tan; G Dalbagni; S M Donat; V Arslan-Carlon
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 4.  Should etomidate be the induction agent of choice for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department?

Authors:  A J Oglesby
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Predictors of severe hypotension in neurocritical care patients sedated with propofol.

Authors:  G Morgan Jones; Bruce A Doepker; Michael J Erdman; Lauren A Kimmons; Lucas Elijovich
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Hemodynamic Responses to Two Different Anesthesia Regimens in Compromised Left Ventricular Function Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Etomidate-Midazolam Versus Propofol-Ketamine.

Authors:  Nahid Aghdaii; Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Seyedeh Zahra Faritus; Rasoul Azarfarin
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  Reintubation in critically ill patients: procedural complications and implications for care.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Sean Lee; Jon C Rittenberger; James Dargin; Daniel Winger; Lillian Emlet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Shock Index as a Predictor of Post-Intubation Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest; A Review of the Current Evidence.

Authors:  Saqer M Althunayyan
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2019-01

9.  Effect of Preanesthetic Fluid Loading on Postinduction Hypotension and Advanced Cardiac Parameters in Patients with Chronic Compressive Cervical Myelopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anto Paul; Kamath Sriganesh; Dhritiman Chakrabarti; K R Madhusudan Reddy
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2022-08-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.