Literature DB >> 8705185

The influence of the number of fractions and bi-exponential repair kinetics on biological equivalence in pulsed brachytherapy.

W T Millar1, J H Hendry, P A Canney.   

Abstract

A linear-quadratic radiobiological model incorporating single or bi-exponential repair kinetics has been used to show the following and other features when a continuous low dose rate (CLDR) 70 Gy/140 h brachytherapy protocol is replaced by a radiobiologically equivalent pulsed dose rate (PDR) system using 140 fractions for reasons of dosage homogeneity. (1) For equivalent effects in late-reacting tissues, the PDR dose (at 5 or 0.05 Gy min-1) x 1 h intervals needs to be reduced by up to only 3%. Progressively further reductions in dose are required when fewer larger fractions are used. (2) When equivalence using pulsed doses is achieved for one normal tissue type, and extrapolated response doses (ERD) are calculated for other tissue types in the irradiated volume, values of the ERD remain within 5% of each other using the above PDR protocol and associated parameters. (3) For tumours with alpha/beta = 10 Gy and a single repair halftime of 0.1-1.0 h, there is no significant loss of therapeutic benefit using the PDR protocol equivalenced for late normal tissue reactions. The strategy of replacing an LDR boost protocol of about 24 Gy by a PDR protocol gives similar levels to the 70 Gy PDR protocol for the expected percentage increase in the biological dose to normal tissues (due to the PDR protocol alone). These calculations also highlight the importance of the values assumed for the conventional alpha/beta ratio and the repair kinetics when estimating equivalent PDR protocols. The use of an inappropriate radiobiological parameterization will lead to erroneous conclusions with the potential to advocate PDR protocols which will, in practice, lead to an increase in late complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8705185     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-821-457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  5 in total

1.  Biphasic and monophasic repair: comparative implications for biologically equivalent dose calculations in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  W T Millar; J H Hendry; S E Davidson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  A Polo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Application of the concept of biologically effective dose (BED) to patients with Vestibular Schwannomas treated by radiosurgery.

Authors:  John W Hopewell; William T Millar; Christer Lindquist; Håkan Nordström; Pär Lidberg; Jonas Gårding
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2013

4.  Influence of length of interval between pulses in PDR brachytherapy (PDRBT) on value of Biologically Equivalent Dose (BED) in healthy tissues.

Authors:  Janusz Skowronek; Julian Malicki; Grzegorz Zwierzchowski; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-07-06

5.  IMRT and brachytherapy comparison in gynaecological cancer treatment: thinking over dosimetry and radiobiology.

Authors:  Valentina Pinzi; Valeria Landoni; Federica Cattani; Roberta Lazzari; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-12-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.