Literature DB >> 8704500

Patients' perceptions of office medical practice: judging quality through the patients' eyes.

K R Epstein1, C Laine, N J Farber, E C Nelson, F Davidoff.   

Abstract

With increasing pressure to measure quality, patient-based assessments of medical care are becoming increasingly important. Patients offer a unique perspective for evaluating the nontechnical aspects of medical care. This study reviews the importance of utilizing patients' perceptions to measure quality of care in office settings. It also reviews the principles required to conduct a well done survey. The concept of patient perceptions differs from the more commonly measured concept of patient satisfaction, in that perceptions measure whether a patients' needs and expectations are met, in addition to satisfaction. One of the most accurate and efficient means of measuring patients' perceptions is through the use of surveys. As with all standardized data collection, creating and performing high quality surveys of patients' perceptions can be challenging. Valid and reliable patient survey data can enable practitioners to identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate to external reviewers the quality of care they provide to their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8704500     DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9601100204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  13 in total

1.  Consumer opinions with ancillary hospital services: improving service delivery in Turkish hospitals.

Authors:  D Tengilimoglu; A Kisa; S F Dziegielewski
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Primary care research networks: an evolving model meriting national evaluation.

Authors:  Y H Carter; S Shaw; B Sibbald
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Patient satisfaction in Turkey: differences between public and private hospitals.

Authors:  D Tengilimoglu; A Kisa; S F Dziegielewski
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-02

4.  Parents' global rating of mental health correlates with SF-36 scores and health services satisfaction.

Authors:  Jean K Mah; Suzanne Tough; Thomas Fung; Kathleen Douglas-England; Marja Verhoef
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Person centred care and shared decision making: implications for ethics, public health and research.

Authors:  Christian Munthe; Lars Sandman; Daniela Cutas
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-09

6.  Ambulatory health service users' experience of waiting time and expenditure and factors associated with the perception of low quality of care in Mexico.

Authors:  Alma Lucila Sauceda-Valenzuela; Veronika J Wirtz; Yared Santa-Ana-Téllez; Maria de la Luz Kageyama-Escobar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Exploring drivers of patient satisfaction using a random forest algorithm.

Authors:  Mecit Can Emre Simsekler; Noura Hamed Alhashmi; Elie Azar; Nelson King; Rana Adel Mahmoud Ali Luqman; Abdalla Al Mulla
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Perception of quality of care of patients with potentially severe diseases evaluated at a distinct quick diagnostic delivery model: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Carmen Sanclemente-Ansó; Albert Salazar; Xavier Bosch; Cristina Capdevila; Amparo Giménez-Requena; Beatriz Rosón-Hernández; Xavier Corbella
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Key factors determining success of primary eye care through vision centres in rural India: patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Vilas Kovai; Gullapalli N Rao; Brien Holden
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Satisfaction of hospitalized psychiatry patients: why should clinicians care?

Authors:  Xavier-Yves Zendjidjian; Karine Baumstarck; Pascal Auquier; Anderson Loundou; Christophe Lançon; Laurent Boyer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.