Literature DB >> 870410

On consanguineous marriages and the genetic load.

R Chakraborty, A Chakravarti.   

Abstract

It has been reported that studies of the genetic consequences of inbreeding should adopt a different strategy in populations having a relatively old inbreeding history and where inbreeding levels have varied over time. This contention is tested with a series of 39,495 single-birth records from Bombay, India, collected in a World Health Organization survey on congenital malformations. Our analysis reveals that: 1. the incidence of major malformations is significantly higher among the inbred offspring (1.34%) as compared to that among non-inbred ones (0,81%)--a finding at variance with a previous study in the same area; 2. the inbreeding effect on perinatal mortality (stillbirths and mortality during the first few days of life) is also found to be significant. In view of the above findings, the genetic load as disclosed by inbreeding is computed for perinatal mortality, major malformations and pooling these together. A + B, the measure of the number of lethal equivalents per gamete, is found to be at variance with other reports. Such variability can be ascribed to non-genetic factors. Supporting evidence collected from Brazil and Malaysia in the same survey is also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 870410     DOI: 10.1007/bf00390435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  10 in total

1.  ON THE METHODS AVAILABLE FOR ESTIMATING THE LOAD OF MUTATIONS DISCLOSED BY INBREEDING.

Authors:  N FREIRE-MAIA
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1964

2.  2. The concept of genetic load: a reply.

Authors:  J F CROW
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  1. The concept of genetic load: a critique.

Authors:  L D SANGHVI
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Decrease of population fitness upon inbreeding.

Authors:  C C LI
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A study of major congenital defects in Japanese infants.

Authors:  J V NEEL
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1958-12       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Empirical risks in consanguineous marriages: sex ratio, malformation, and viability.

Authors:  W J SCHULL
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Congenital malformations. A report of a study of series of consecutive births in 24 centres.

Authors:  A C Stevenson; H A Johnston; M I Stewart; D R Golding
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  Inbreeding in India.

Authors:  L D Sanghvi
Journal:  Eugen Q       Date:  1966-12

10.  Human genetic studies in areas of high natural radiation. VIII. Genetic load not related to radiation.

Authors:  A Freire-Maia; H Krieger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 11.025

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  AB0 blood group incompatibility and inbreeding effects: evidence for an interaction.

Authors:  R Renuka Nair; J S Murty
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Genetic load in an isolated tribal population of South India.

Authors:  A K Ghosh; P P Majumder
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979-10-01       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Two classes of deleterious recessive alleles in a natural population of zebrafish, Danio rerio.

Authors:  Amy R McCune; David Houle; Kyle McMillan; Rebecca Annable; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Consanguinity and birth defects in the jerusalem perinatal study cohort.

Authors:  S Harlap; K Kleinhaus; M C Perrin; R Calderon-Margalit; O Paltiel; L Deutsch; O Manor; E Tiram; R Yanetz; Y Friedlander
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Royal dynasties as human inbreeding laboratories: the Habsburgs.

Authors:  F C Ceballos; G Alvarez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Runs of homozygosity implicate autozygosity as a schizophrenia risk factor.

Authors:  Matthew C Keller; Matthew A Simonson; Stephan Ripke; Ben M Neale; Pablo V Gejman; Daniel P Howrigan; Sang Hong Lee; Todd Lencz; Douglas F Levinson; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Inbreeding, Allee effects and stochasticity might be sufficient to account for Neanderthal extinction.

Authors:  Krist Vaesen; Fulco Scherjon; Lia Hemerik; Alexander Verpoorte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents.

Authors:  Vagheesh M Narasimhan; Karen A Hunt; Dan Mason; Christopher L Baker; Konrad J Karczewski; Michael R Barnes; Anthony H Barnett; Chris Bates; Srikanth Bellary; Nicholas A Bockett; Kristina Giorda; Christopher J Griffiths; Harry Hemingway; Zhilong Jia; M Ann Kelly; Hajrah A Khawaja; Monkol Lek; Shane McCarthy; Rosie McEachan; Anne O'Donnell-Luria; Kenneth Paigen; Constantinos A Parisinos; Eamonn Sheridan; Laura Southgate; Louise Tee; Mark Thomas; Yali Xue; Michael Schnall-Levin; Petko M Petkov; Chris Tyler-Smith; Eamonn R Maher; Richard C Trembath; Daniel G MacArthur; John Wright; Richard Durbin; David A van Heel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.