Literature DB >> 8703251

Supportive care by maternity nurses: a work sampling study in an intrapartum unit.

A J Gagnon, K Waghorn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This work sampling study examined how much time intrapartum unit nurses spend providing supportive care overall and during weekday and weekend shifts, and by patient and staff characteristics at a university hospital with 4000 births per year in Montréal, Québec.
METHODS: Four-hour observation periods were randomly selected to represent each shift and day of the week. Within each period, eight 15-minute observation times were randomly selected. Observers located each nurse assigned to the unit at that time and recorded her activity. Supportive activities included physical comfort, emotional support, instruction, and advocacy.
RESULTS: The percentage of time spent in supportive care was 6.1 percent (95% confidence interval 5.3%, 6.9%), based on 3367 observations. The time providing supportive care was similar for weekday and weekend shifts. Nurses with less than seven years of intrapartum experience spent 2.7 percent (0.9, 4.5) more time providing supportive care than nurses with seven years of experience or more. Supportive care was 9.2 percent (0.7, 17.7) greater for nulliparous than for parous women, and supportive care of women with epidural anesthesia was similar to those without it.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that intrapartum unit nurses spent a small amount of time providing supportive care to women in labor. This suggests the need for perinatal caregivers and hospital administrators to reexamine how nurses spend their time, given the evidence from randomized trials showing the beneficial effects of continuous support on labor and birth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703251     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1996.tb00453.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  9 in total

1.  Factors associated with labor support behaviors of nurses.

Authors:  Samantha J Barrett; Mary Ann Stark
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Fetal health surveillance: a community-wide approach versus a tailored intervention for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Barbara Davies; Ellen Hodnett; Mary Hannah; Linda O'Brien-Pallas; Dorothy Pringle; George Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Do birthing options really exist?

Authors:  J A Lothian
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2001

4.  The Effects of Childbirth Education on Maternity Outcomes and Maternal Satisfaction.

Authors:  Colleen G Mueller; Pamela J Webb; Stephanie Morgan
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2020-01-01

5.  Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Kate F Walker; Philippa Wilson; George J Bugg; Anna Dencker; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Assessing the precision of a time-sampling-based study among GPs: balancing sample size and measurement frequency.

Authors:  Daniël van Hassel; Lud van der Velden; Dinny de Bakker; Lucas van der Hoek; Ronald Batenburg
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-12-04

7.  Job performance in healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marcel Krijgsheld; Lars G Tummers; Floortje E Scheepers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Measuring the quality and quantity of professional intrapartum support: testing a computerised systematic observation tool in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Mary C Ross-Davie; Helen Cheyne; Catherine Niven
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Exploring the perspective of nursing staff or caregivers on birthing positions in Central India.

Authors:  Anita Yadav; Anusha Kamath; Shuchita Mundle; Jyoti Baghel; Charu Sharma; Avinash Prakash
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.