Literature DB >> 8703086

Phylogenetic relationships of annelids, molluscs, and arthropods evidenced from molecules and morphology.

C B Kim1, S Y Moon, S R Gelder, W Kim.   

Abstract

Annelids and arthropods have long been considered each other's closest relatives, as evidenced by similarities in their segmented body plans. An alternative view, more recently advocated by investigators who have examined partial 18S ribosomal RNA data, proposes that annelids, molluscs, and certain other minor phyla with trochophore larva stages share a more recent common ancestor with one another than any do with arthropods. The two hypotheses are mutually exclusive in explaining spiralian relationships. Cladistic analysis of morphological data does not reveal phylogentic relationships among major spiralian taxa but does suggest monophyly for both the annelids and molluscs. Distance and maximum-likelihood analyses of 18S rRNA gene sequences from major spiralian taxa suggest a sister relationship between annelids and molluscs and provide a clear resolution within the major groups of the spiralians. The parsimonious tree based on molecular data, however, indicates a sister relationship of the Annelida and Bivalvia, and an earlier divergence of the Gastropoda than the Annelida-Bivalvia clade. To test further hypotheses on the phylogenetic relationships among annelids, molluscs, and arthropods, and the ingroup relationships within the major spiralian taxa, we combine the molecular and morphological data sets and subject the combined data matrix to parsimony analysis. The resulting tree suggests that the molluscs and annelids form a monophyletic lineage and unites the molluscan taxa to a monophyletic group. Therefore, the result supports the Eutrochozoa hypothesis and the monophyly of molluscs, and indicates early acquisition of segmented body plans in arthropods.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703086     DOI: 10.1007/BF02338828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  20 in total

1.  Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  D M Hillis; J P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic affinities of Saccoglossus cambrensis Brambell & Cole (Hemichordata).

Authors:  P W Holland; A M Hacker; N A Williams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1991-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.

Authors:  Joseph Felsenstein
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE FROM RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE CLEAVAGE SITE MAPS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE EVOLUTION OF HUMANS AND THE APES.

Authors:  Alan R Templeton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  A rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony.

Authors:  J A Lake
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 7.  Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom.

Authors:  K G Field; G J Olsen; D J Lane; S J Giovannoni; M T Ghiselin; E C Raff; N R Pace; R A Raff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Phylogeny of protostome worms derived from 18S rRNA sequences.

Authors:  B Winnepenninckx; T Backeljau; R De Wachter
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology.

Authors:  D J Eernisse; A G Kluge
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of systematic data.

Authors:  J Gatesy; R DeSalle; W Wheeler
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.286

View more
  3 in total

1.  Myzostomida: a link between trochozoans and flatworms?

Authors:  I Eeckhaut; D McHugh; P Mardulyn; R Tiedemann; D Monteyne; M Jangoux; M C Milinkovitch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Reconstructing the eyes of Urbilateria.

Authors:  D Arendt; J Wittbrodt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Development of the nervous system in Platynereis dumerilii (Nereididae, Annelida).

Authors:  Viktor V Starunov; Elena E Voronezhskaya; Leonid P Nezlin
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.