Literature DB >> 8702903

Effect of cAMP binding site mutations on the interaction of cAMP receptor protein with cyclic nucleoside monophosphate ligands and DNA.

J L Moore1, I I Gorshkova, J W Brown, K H McKenney, F P Schwarz.   

Abstract

Although cAMP binding to wild type cAMP receptor protein (CRP) induces specific DNA binding and activates transcription, cyclic nucleoside monophosphate (cNMP) binding to the CRP mutant Ser128 --> Ala does not, whereas the double CRP mutant Thr127 --> Leu/Ser128 --> Ala activates transcription even in the absence of cNMP. Isothermal titration calorimetry measurements on the cNMP binding reactions to the S128A and T127L/S128A mutants show that the reactions are mainly entropically driven as is cAMP binding to CRP. In contrast to cAMP binding to CRP, the binding reactions are noncooperative and exothermic with binding enthalpies (DeltaHb) ranging from -23.4 +/- 0.9 kJ mol-1 for cAMP binding to S128A at 39 degrees C to -4.1 +/- 0.6 kJ mol-1 for cAMP binding to T127L/S128A at 24 degrees C and exhibit enthalpy-entropy compensation. To account for the inactivity of the S128A mutant, in vitro and in vivo DNA binding experiments were performed on the cAMP-ligated S128A mutant. The cAMP-ligated S128A mutant binds to the consensus DNA binding site with approximately the same affinity as that of cAMP-ligated CRP but forms a different type of complex, which may account for loss of transcriptional activity by the mutant. Energy minimization computations on the cAMP-ligated S128A mutant show that amino acid conformational differences between S128A and CRP occur at Ser179, Glu181, and Thr182 in the center of the DNA binding site, implying that these conformational changes may account for the difference in DNA binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8702903     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  4 in total

1.  Study of highly constitutively active mutants suggests how cAMP activates cAMP receptor protein.

Authors:  Hwan Youn; Robert L Kerby; Mary Conrad; Gary P Roberts
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis cAMP receptor protein (Rv3676) differs from the Escherichia coli paradigm in its cAMP binding and DNA binding properties and transcription activation properties.

Authors:  Melanie Stapleton; Ihtshamul Haq; Debbie M Hunt; Kristine B Arnvig; Peter J Artymiuk; Roger S Buxton; Jeffrey Green
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Protein nanoparticles engineered to sense kinase activity in MRI.

Authors:  Mikhail G Shapiro; Jerzy O Szablowski; Robert Langer; Alan Jasanoff
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  The crystal structures of apo and cAMP-bound GlxR from Corynebacterium glutamicum reveal structural and dynamic changes upon cAMP binding in CRP/FNR family transcription factors.

Authors:  Philip D Townsend; Britta Jungwirth; Florence Pojer; Michael Bußmann; Victoria A Money; Stewart T Cole; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Tauch; Michael Bott; Martin J Cann; Ehmke Pohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.