Literature DB >> 8702092

Predicting clinical states in individual patients.

L E Braitman1, F Davidoff.   

Abstract

A probability model expresses the relation between the presence of clinical findings (input or independent variables) and the probability that a clinical state will occur (the dependent variable); for example, it expresses the probability that a disease is present or will develop or the probability that an outcome state will be reached. Probability models are developed by using selected study groups. Although these models are most often used to make predictions for groups of patients, they can also predict clinical states for individual patients. The following seven criteria provide a basis for the critical appraisal of probability models. In particular, physicians can use these criteria to decide when a specific probability model should be used to make a prediction in an individual patient. Five of the criteria are concerned with the applicability of a model to a particular patient: 1) the comparability of the patient and the study group used to develop the model; 2) the congruence between the clinical state of interest to patient and physician and the model's outcome; 3) the availability of all input variables where and when the prediction is to be made; 4) the usefulness of a quantitative estimate of the predicted clinical state; and 5) the degree of uncertainty in the probability estimate. The other two criteria are concerned with how well the probability model "works": 6) the fit of probabilities calculated from the model to the outcomes actually observed and 7) the model's ability to discriminate between outcome states relative to chance and to other, more traditional, prediction methods. We illustrate the use of these criteria by applying them, in the form of questions, to a convenient, tabular version of a model that estimates a patient's chances of surviving for 10 years after having definitive surgical therapy for primary cutaneous melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8702092     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-5-199609010-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  23 in total

1.  Recommendations for the assessment and reporting of multivariable logistic regression in transplantation literature.

Authors:  A C Kalil; J Mattei; D F Florescu; J Sun; R S Kalil
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Ethical aspects of determining and communicating prognosis in critical care.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Observations on Ethical Issues in the Neuro-ICU.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Survival estimates for patients with abnormal swallowing studies.

Authors:  M E Cowen; S L Simpson; T E Vettese
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Risk score for identifying adults with CSF pleocytosis and negative CSF Gram stain at low risk for an urgent treatable cause.

Authors:  Rodrigo Hasbun; Merijn Bijlsma; Matthijs C Brouwer; Nabil Khoury; Christiane M Hadi; Arie van der Ende; Susan H Wootton; Lucrecia Salazar; Md Monir Hossain; Mark Beilke; Diederik van de Beek
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 6.072

6.  Predicting the Long-Term Outcome after Subacute Stroke within the Middle Cerebral Artery Territory.

Authors:  Oh Young Bang; Hee Young Park; Jung Han Yoon; Seung Hyeon Yeo; Ji Won Kim; Mi Ae Lee; Mi Hee Park; Phil Hyu Lee; In Soo Joo; Kyoon Huh
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D F Signorini; P J Andrews; P A Jones; J M Wardlaw; J D Miller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Meningitis with a negative cerebrospinal fluid Gram stain in adults: risk classification for an adverse clinical outcome.

Authors:  Nabil T Khoury; Md Monir Hossain; Susan H Wootton; Lucrecia Salazar; Rodrigo Hasbun
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Factors that predict short-term intensive care unit mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Ranjeeta Bahirwani; Marwan Ghabril; Kimberly A Forde; Hemant Chatrath; Karen M Wolf; Lindsay Uribe; K Rajender Reddy; Barry Fuchs; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  A new simplified immediate prognostic risk score for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B A Williams; R S Wright; J G Murphy; E S Brilakis; G S Reeder; A S Jaffe
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.