Literature DB >> 8702065

Repair of orthodontically induced root resorption in adolescents.

P Owman-Moll1, J Kurol, D Lundgren.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to study the reparative potential of orthodontically induced root resorption. Sixty-four maxillary right and left first premolars in 32 patients (15 boys and 17 girls, mean age 13.7 years) were moved buccally with fixed orthodontic appliances and a continuous force of 50 cN (approximately 50 g), activated weekly for 6 weeks. The patients were divided into 4 groups of 8. Retention periods varied from 1 week to 8 weeks. Histological preparations showed that root resorption affected all the test teeth. The percentage of resorptive areas that had begun to repair ranged from 28% after 1 week of retention to 75% after 8 weeks. The healing cementum was almost exclusively of the cellular type. Partial repair, with the resorption cavity walls only partially covered with cementum, was the most frequent type of repair during the first 4 weeks of retention (17% to 31%). Functional repair, with the total surface of the resorption cavity walls covered with varying thicknesses of cementum, dominated after 5, 6, 7 and 8 weeks of retention (33% to 40%). There were no large differences in the healing potential in the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the root. After 8 weeks, three out of four resorptive areas showed some degree of repair. Individual variations in healing potential were large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8702065     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0403:ROOIRR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  27 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for the management of external root resorption.

Authors:  Zohreh Ahangari; Mona Nasser; Mina Mahdian; Zbys Fedorowicz; Melissa A Marchesan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-24

2.  Quantitive evaluation of dentin sialoprotein (DSP) using microbeads - a potential early marker of root resorption.

Authors:  L Lombardo; F Carinci; M Martini; D Gemmati; M Nardone; G Siciliani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

3.  Gene expression profile of compressed primary human cementoblasts before and after IL-1β stimulation.

Authors:  Katja Diercke; Sebastian Zingler; Annette Kohl; Christopher J Lux; Ralf Erber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The effects of low-level laser therapy on orthodontically induced root resorption.

Authors:  A Burcu Altan; A Altug Bicakci; H Ilhan Mutaf; Mahmut Ozkut; V Sevinc Inan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  Root Resorption in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Furkan Dindaroğlu; Servet Doğan
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Group Distal Movement of Teeth using Micro-Screw-Implant Anchorage-A Case Report.

Authors:  Biju Kalarickal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Compression of human primary cementoblasts leads to apoptosis: A possible cause of dental root resorption?

Authors:  Katja Diercke; Annett Kohl; Christopher J Lux; Ralf Erber
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Inhibition of AXUD1 attenuates compression-dependent apoptosis of cementoblasts.

Authors:  Katja Korb; Eleni Katsikogianni; Sebastian Zingler; Edith Daum; Christopher J Lux; Axel Hohenstein; Ralf Erber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Detection of root resorption using dentin and bone markers.

Authors:  A George; C A Evans
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  IL-1β and compressive forces lead to a significant induction of RANKL-expression in primary human cementoblasts.

Authors:  Katja Diercke; Annette Kohl; Christopher J Lux; Ralf Erber
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.