Literature DB >> 8700766

Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany.

K H Friedl1, K A Hiller, G Schmalz.   

Abstract

From 15 September to 15 October 1991, 102 dentists practicing in a rural area of Germany provided information on 3375 composite resin fillings. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to record the reasons for placement and replacement of composite resin restorations, including any change of material when replacing a filling, and to register the age of any failed restoration. First placements because of primary caries were made in 50.6% of all cases; 49.4% were replacements of failed restorations. Composite resins were used as a material for the first placement of a restoration in 19.2% of primary teeth and in 47.8% of permanent teeth. More amalgams were replaced by composites than vice versa. Secondary caries was the most frequent reason for replacement in permanent teeth and in restorations with less than four surfaces, whereas fracture caused most failures in primary teeth and in fillings with four surfaces. The median age of the replaced restorations was 43.5 months. Failed restorations with four surfaces had the lowest median age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8700766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  13 in total

1.  Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.

Authors:  Erinne B Lubisich; Thomas J Hilton; Jack L Ferracane; Hristina I Pashova; Bruce Burton
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Survival characteristics of composite restorations in primary teeth.

Authors:  Katharina Bücher; Isabel Metz; Vinay Pitchika; Reinhard Hickel; Jan Kühnisch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The microfloral analysis of secondary caries biofilm around Class I and Class II composite and amalgam fillings.

Authors:  Si-su Mo; Wei Bao; Guang-yun Lai; Jun Wang; Ming-yu Li
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Determination of the optimal photoinitiator concentration in dental composites based on essential material properties.

Authors:  L Musanje; J L Ferracane; R L Sakaguchi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes.

Authors:  H Javidi; M Tickle; V R Aggarwal
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Reasons for Placement and Replacement of Resin-based Composite Restorations in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-09-05

7.  Reasons for Retreatment of Amalgam and Composite Restorations among the Patients Referring to Tabriz Faculty of Dentistry.

Authors:  Soodabeh Kimyai; Masomeh Mehdipour; Siavash Savadi Oskoee; Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee; Armin Abbaszadeh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2007-06-10

8.  Placement, replacement and longevity of composite resin-based restorations in permanent teeth in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Chrysanthakopoulos
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 9.  Modelling the longevity of dental restorations by means of a CBR system.

Authors:  Ignacio J Aliaga; Vicente Vera; Juan F De Paz; Alvaro E García; Mohd Saberi Mohamad
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Re-Treatment Decisions for Failed Posterior Restorations among Dentists in Kuwait.

Authors:  Qasem Alomari; Bader Al-Kanderi; Muawia Qudeimat; Ridwaan Omar
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.