Literature DB >> 8699454

Relative abundance and species composition of mosquito populations (Diptera:Culicidae) in a La Crosse virus-endemic area in western North Carolina.

D E Szumlas1, C S Apperson, E E Powell, P Hartig, D B Francy, N Karabotsos.   

Abstract

Container surveys were conducted in 5 communities on the Cherokee Indian Reservation, an area of western North Carolina endemic for transmission of La Crosse (LAC) virus, to determine the potential for peridomestic mosquito breeding, the relative abundance of mosquito species, and the standing crop of mosquitoes per residence. Eleven species of mosquitoes were collected, but 80.9% of all mosquitoes reared from containers were Aedes triseriatus (Say). All communities averaged > 6 containers per residence, indicating that the potential for mosquito production was high. The Breteau index and mean standing crop of adults per residence in the 5 communities were highly concordant. LAC virus was isolated from 2 pools of 56 female and 36 male Ae. triseriatus adults that were reared from eggs collected by ovitraps. The minimum field infection rate was 0.26 per 1,000 adults tested. Aedes triseriatus, the most frequently collected blood-fed mosquito (98/112 blood-engorged specimens), fed predominantly on dogs (40.4%), rabbits (26.6%), and turtles (22.3%). Only 7.5% of the blood-fed mosquitoes had fed on eastern chipmunks. Peridomestic conditions on the Reservation appear to contribute to the maintenance of LAC virus transmission. Production of Ae. triseriatus occurs in artificial containers discarded around residences, and wooded areas immediately adjacent to residences provide resting cover for mosquitoes as well as suitable habitat for LAC virus reservoir hosts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8699454     DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/33.4.598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  7 in total

1.  Host-feeding patterns of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in relation to availability of human and domestic animals in suburban landscapes of central North Carolina.

Authors:  Stephanie L Richards; Loganathan Ponnusamy; Thomas R Unnasch; Hassan K Hassan; Charles S Apperson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 2.  Impacts of climate, land use, and biological invasion on the ecology of immature Aedes mosquitoes: implications for La Crosse emergence.

Authors:  Paul T Leisnham; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Mosquito and arbovirus activity during 1997-2002 in a wetland in northeastern Mississippi.

Authors:  E W Cupp; K J Tennessen; W K Oldland; H K Hassan; G E Hill; C R Katholi; T R Unnasch
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  First isolation of La Crosse virus from naturally infected Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  R R Gerhardt; K L Gottfried; C S Apperson; B S Davis; P C Erwin; A B Smith; N A Panella; E E Powell; R S Nasci
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Cemeteries are effective sites for monitoring la crosse virus (LACv) and these environments may play a role in LACv infection.

Authors:  Rebecca T Trout Fryxell; Kimberly Freyman; Armando Ulloa; Brian Hendricks; Dave Paulsen; Agricola Odoi; Abelardo Moncayo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Epidemiology of La Crosse Virus Emergence, Appalachia Region, United States.

Authors:  Sharon Bewick; Folashade Agusto; Justin M Calabrese; Ephantus J Muturi; William F Fagan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Local persistence of novel regional variants of La Crosse virus in the Northeast USA.

Authors:  Gillian Eastwood; John J Shepard; Michael J Misencik; Theodore G Andreadis; Philip M Armstrong
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.