Literature DB >> 8698846

Dominant negative mutants of Myc inhibit cooperation of both Myc and adenovirus serotype-5 E1a with Ras.

D MacGregor1, L H Li, E B Ziff.   

Abstract

We have used dominant negative Myc mutants to analyze the Myc and E1a mechanisms of cooperation with Ras. We show that mutants of Myc with an altered basic region (BR; RR366, 367EE) or deletion of the leucine zipper (LZ; delta aa 414-439), changes which modify the DNA binding domain, or with deletions in the Myc amino terminal conserved regions box 1 (dlMB1; delta aa 46-55) and box 2 (dlMB2; delta aa 132-140) inhibit cooperation of wt Myc and activated Ras to transform rat embryo fibroblasts (REF). Expression of the amino terminal 104 aa had no effect whereas wt Myc stimulated focus formation. Mutant dlMB1 cooperated with Ras with one half wt efficiency while dlMB2 was inactive. No mutant tested was toxic during neomycin cotransformation of REF to G418 resistance. Interestingly, these Myc mutants exerted a parallel inhibition of E1a-Ras cooperation to transform REF. This suggests that the Myc-Ras and E1a-Ras cooperation pathways intersect and require common protein factors. A Myc box 2 deletion mutant which is a wt transactivator of the Myc responsive ornithine decarboxylase promoter, but unlike the wt does not repress the adenovirus-2 core promoter (Li et al., 1994, EMBO J., 13:4070-4079), inhibits Myc-Ras and E1a-Ras cooperation. This suggests that a box 2-dependent step, potentially gene repression, is required for both the E1a- and Myc-Ras cooperation mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8698846     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199604)167:1<95::AID-JCP11>3.0.CO;2-O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  7 in total

1.  A general method to design dominant negatives to B-HLHZip proteins that abolish DNA binding.

Authors:  D Krylov; K Kasai; D R Echlin; E J Taparowsky; H Arnheiter; C Vinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The essential cofactor TRRAP recruits the histone acetyltransferase hGCN5 to c-Myc.

Authors:  S B McMahon; M A Wood; M D Cole
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Three unrelated viral transforming proteins (vIRF, EBNA2, and E1A) induce the MYC oncogene through the interferon-responsive PRF element by using different transcription coadaptors.

Authors:  S Jayachandra; K G Low; A E Thlick; J Yu; P D Ling; Y Chang; P S Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Myc represses transcription of the growth arrest gene gas1.

Authors:  T C Lee; L Li; L Philipson; E B Ziff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Thrombospondin-1 repression is mediated via distinct mechanisms in fibroblasts and epithelial cells.

Authors:  R S Watnick; R K Rodriguez; S Wang; A L Blois; A Rangarajan; T Ince; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Wnt and FGF signals interact to coordinate growth with cell fate specification during limb development.

Authors:  Derk ten Berge; Samantha A Brugmann; Jill A Helms; Roel Nusse
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Transcriptional profiling of the Sonic hedgehog response: a critical role for N-myc in proliferation of neuronal precursors.

Authors:  Trudy G Oliver; Linda L Grasfeder; Audra L Carroll; Constanze Kaiser; Christine L Gillingham; Simon M Lin; Rasika Wickramasinghe; Matthew P Scott; Robert J Wechsler-Reya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.