Literature DB >> 8698059

Tracer kinetic modelling of receptor data with mathematical metabolite correction.

C Burger1, A Buck.   

Abstract

Quantitation of metabolic processes with dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) and tracer kinetic modelling relies on the time course of authentic ligand in plasma, i.e. the input curve. The determination of the latter often requires the measurement of labelled metabolites, a laborious procedure. In this study we examined the possibility of mathematical metabolite correction, which might obviate the need for actual metabolite measurements. Mathematical metabolite correction was implemented by estimating the input curve together with kinetic tissue parameters. The general feasibility of the approach was evaluated in a Monte Carlo simulation using a two tissue compartment model. The method was then applied to a series of five human carbon-11 iomazenil PET studies. The measured cerebral tissue time-activity curves were fitted with a single tissue compartment model. For mathematical metabolite correction the input curve following the peak was approximated by a sum of three decaying exponentials, the amplitudes and characteristic half-times of which were then estimated by the fitting routine. In the simulation study the parameters used to generate synthetic tissue time-activity curves (K1-k4) were refitted with reasonable identifiability when using mathematical metabolite correction. Absolute quantitation of distribution volumes was found to be possible provided that the metabolite and the kinetic models are adequate. If the kinetic model is oversimplified, the linearity of the correlation between true and estimated distribution volumes is still maintained, although the linear regression becomes dependent on the input curve. These simulation results were confirmed when applying mathematical metabolite correction to the [11C]iomazenil study. Estimates of the distribution volume calculated with a measured input curve were linearly related to the estimates calculated using mathematical metabolite correction with correlation coefficients >0.990. However, the slope of the regression line displayed considerable variability among the subjects (0.33-0.95), demonstrating that absolute quantitation of the distribution volume was impaired. Mathematical metabolite correction is a feasible method and may prove useful in cases where actual metabolite data cannot be obtained. The potential for absolute quantitation seems limited, but the method allows the quantitative assessment of regional ratios of receptor measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8698059     DOI: 10.1007/bf00833389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  12 in total

1.  Modeling alternatives for cerebral carbon-11-iomazenil kinetics.

Authors:  A Buck; G Westera; G K vonSchulthess; C Burger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Blood sampling devices and measurements.

Authors:  L Eriksson; I Kanno
Journal:  Med Prog Technol       Date:  1991

3.  The effects of measurement errors in the plasma radioactivity curve on parameter estimation in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K W Chen; S C Huang; D C Yu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Experimental design optimisation: theory and application to estimation of receptor model parameters using dynamic positron emission tomography.

Authors:  J Delforge; A Syrota; B M Mazoyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A computer simulation study on the effects of input function measurement noise in tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography (PET).

Authors:  D Feng; X Wang
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  SPECT quantification of [123I]iomazenil binding to benzodiazepine receptors in nonhuman primates: I. Kinetic modeling of single bolus experiments.

Authors:  M Laruelle; R M Baldwin; Z Rattner; M S al-Tikriti; Y Zea-Ponce; S S Zoghbi; D S Charney; J C Price; J J Frost; P B Hoffer
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Carbon-11 and iodine-123 labelled iomazenil: a direct PET-SPET compari son.

Authors:  G Westera; A Buck; C Burger; K L Leenders; G K von Schulthess; A P Schubiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-01

8.  Modeling of carbon-11-acetate kinetics by simultaneously fitting data from multiple ROIs coupled by common parameters.

Authors:  R R Raylman; G D Hutchins; R S Beanlands; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Effect of carbon-11-acetate recirculation on estimates of myocardial oxygen consumption by PET.

Authors:  A Buck; H G Wolpers; G D Hutchins; V Savas; T J Mangner; N Nguyen; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Models for computer simulation studies of input functions for tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D Feng; S C Huang; X Wang
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1993-03
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Determination of the Input Function at the Entry of the Tissue of Interest and Its Impact on PET Kinetic Modeling Parameters.

Authors:  M'hamed Bentourkia
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Plasma radiometabolite correction in dynamic PET studies: Insights on the available modeling approaches.

Authors:  Matteo Tonietto; Gaia Rizzo; Mattia Veronese; Masahiro Fujita; Sami S Zoghbi; Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Alessandra Bertoldo
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Simultaneous radiomethylation of [11C]harmine and [11C]DASB and kinetic modeling approach for serotonergic brain imaging in the same individual.

Authors:  Chrysoula Vraka; Matej Murgaš; Lucas Rischka; Barbara Katharina Geist; Rupert Lanzenberger; Gregor Gryglewski; Thomas Zenz; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Mitterhauser; Marcus Hacker; Cécile Philippe; Verena Pichler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Total-Body PET Kinetic Modeling and Potential Opportunities Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yiran Wang; Elizabeth Li; Simon R Cherry; Guobao Wang
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-08-03

Review 6.  Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Leyun Pan; Christos Sachpekidis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 9.236

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.