Literature DB >> 8697854

Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies.

Y Friedman1, J Fildes, B Mizock, J Samuel, S Patel, S Appavu, R Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) with surgical tracheostomy (ST).
DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial.
SETTING: Public urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients were randomized to undergo PDT and 27 patients to ST.
RESULTS: The time from randomization into the study until tracheostomy was performed was 28.5 +/- 27.9 h in the PDT group and 100.4 +/- 95.0 h in the ST group (p < 0.001). PDT was performed in 8.2 +/- 4.9 min vs 33.9 +/- 14.0 min for ST (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in intraprocedural complications between the groups. Postprocedural complication rates were 12% for PDT and 41% for ST (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: PDT is superior to ST logistically. PDT can be performed at the bedside eliminating the risk of patient transport. Because operating room scheduling is not necessary, PDT can be performed earlier once the decision to do a tracheostomy is made, which will improve ICU utilization. PDT is a faster procedure to perform and has fewer postprocedural complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8697854     DOI: 10.1378/chest.110.2.480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  44 in total

1.  Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a double-blind randomized trial.

Authors:  C Gysin; P Dulguerov; J P Guyot; T V Perneger; B Abajo; J C Chevrolet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A single-center 8-year experience with percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.

Authors:  P A Kearney; M M Griffen; J B Ochoa; B R Boulanger; B J Tseui; R M Mentzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Percutaneous (Portex) tracheostomy: an audit of the Newcastle experience.

Authors:  J P Jeannon; D Mathias
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Recent advances in intensive care. Percutaneous tracheostomy may not be more effective than open technique.

Authors:  N Brookes; D Howard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-17

5.  Percutaneous tracheostomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques.

Authors:  K M Kost
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Sotirios Pappas; Pavlos Maragoudakis; Petros Vlastarakos; Dimitrios Assimakopoulos; Thomi Mandrali; Dimitrios Kandiloros; Thomas P Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 9.  Tracheotomy-Related Deaths.

Authors:  Eckart Klemm; Andreas Karl Nowak
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--early results and long-term outcome of 326 critically ill patients.

Authors:  M K Walz; K Peitgen; N Thürauf; H A Trost; U Wolfhard; A Sander; C Ahmadi; F W Eigler
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.