Literature DB >> 8696728

Role of the Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of controlled trials and a meta-analysis.

M P Simons1, J Kleijnen, D van Geldere, H F Hoitsma, H Obertop.   

Abstract

The Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair has been suggested by some authors as the best conventional method against which other methods using prostheses should be compared. The paper which follows is a systematic review involving a comprehensive search of the medical literature to identify all clinical trials (article or abstract) evaluating the Shouldice repair. After assessment of certain quality criteria, the best studies were pooled in a meta-analysis. Nine publications were found with 11 study arms. In ten studies the results of the Shouldice technique were better than the results of the control arm. Six studies could be pooled in a meta-analysis of 2500 patients; Shouldice was significantly better than control methods (relative risk 0.62 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.45-0.85)). In spite of possible bias caused by different variables (modifications in operative technique, suture material, level of surgeon, follow-up methods and outcome measurement), the results of this systematic review suggest that the Shouldice method is the best current conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8696728     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

Review 1.  Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  A 10-year follow-up study on endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia.

Authors:  M Staarink; R N van Veen; W C Hop; W F Weidema
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Inguinal hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a baseline study before the introduction of the Dutch Guidelines.

Authors:  D H de Lange; Th J Aufenacker; M Roest; R K J Simmermacher; D J Gouma; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  R Bittner; S Sauerland; C-G Schmedt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Recurrence risks in randomized trials of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: to pool or not to pool (this is not the question).

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Kai Bauwens; Axel Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Inguinal hernia repair in the Amsterdam region 1994-1996.

Authors:  I G Schoots; B van Dijkman; R M Butzelaar; D van Geldere; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Bruno Amato; Lorenzo Moja; Salvatore Panico; Giovanni Persico; Corrado Rispoli; Nicola Rocco; Ivan Moschetti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

8.  A prospective trial of primary inguinal hernia repair by surgical trainees.

Authors:  B W Miedema; S M Ibrahim; B D Davis; D G Koivunen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Early experience of performing a modified Kugel hernia repair with local anesthesia.

Authors:  Junsheng Li; Yanan Zhang; Haolin Hu; Whenhao Tang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.