The effects of anterior hypothalamic lesions on short-day responses in Siberian hamsters given timed melatonin infusions.

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is an area of dense 2-[125I]Iodomelatonin binding in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus sungorus) that is suggestive of a possible role in the reception and/or relaying of melatonin (MEL) signals. Indeed, in pinealectomized male Siberian hamsters given short day (SD) MEL signals (long-duration MEL infusions), lesions of the SCN (SCNx) block testicular regression and decreases in body and fat pad masses seen in identically treated hamsters with sham lesions (SCNs). In similar studies using Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), anterior hypothalamic lesions (AHx), but not SCNx, blocked SD MEL signal-induced gonadal regression despite the similarity in the 2-[125I]Iodomelatonin binding pattern between the two species. The discrepancy between the ability of SCNx to block the reception of SD MEL signals between the two species is puzzling, given the similarity in the reproductive status of the Syrian and Siberian hamsters to systemically administered and timed MEL infusions. One possible way of reconciling the differences between these studies was that ancillary damage to areas neighboring the SCN, including the AH, may have occurred in our attempt to achieve complete SCNx in Siberian hamsters. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to challenge AHx Siberian hamsters with SD MEL signals. Adult male hamsters were pinealectomized, fitted with subcutaneous catheters, and given daily timed infusions of MEL for 5 or 10 h (long day-like and short day-like, respectively) or the saline vehicle for 6 wk following bilateral electrolytic, or sham (AHs) lesions of the AH. Hamsters receiving 10 h MEL infusions that lacked evidence of anatomical or functional damage to the SCN showed SD-like gonadal regression, decreases in body and fat pad mass, and food intake similar to that observed in AHs animals. In contrast, 10 h MEL-infused SCNx hamsters did not exhibit SD-like responses, a finding confirming our previous report. These data suggest that interspecies differences exist between Syrian and Siberian hamsters in central nervous system sites and pathways involved in the reception/transmission of SD MEL signals.