Literature DB >> 8694727

Intraocular pressure-raising potential of 1.0% rimexolone in patients responding to corticosteroids.

H M Leibowitz1, J D Bartlett, R Rich, H McQuirter, R Stewart, K Assil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) elevating potential of 1.0% rimexolone and 0.1% fluorometholone alcohol ophthalmic suspensions in patients known to have responded to corticosteroids.
DESIGN: In a double-masked, randomized, single-eye, crossover protocol, corticosteroid responsiveness initially was verified in 40 asymptomatic known steroid responders by challenge with either 0.1% dexamethasone sodium phosphate or 1.0% prednisolone acetate for up to 6 weeks. After a 1-month medication washout, subjects randomly received either rimexolone or fluorometholone for 6 weeks. Medications were again discontinued for 1 month, and subjects then received the alternate drug for 6 weeks.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between rimexolone and fluorometholone in the number of subjects demonstrating a 10-mm Hg increase in IOP or in the mean number of weeks required to achieve a 10-mm Hg response. Responses occurred in significantly more subjects receiving dexamethasone sodium phosphate (P = .001) or prednisolone acetate (P < .001) and in a significantly shorter interval than in subjects receiving rimexolone.
CONCLUSIONS: Rimexolone has a low IOP-elevating potential, comparable to that of fluorometholone and less than that of dexamethasone sodium phosphate and prednisolone acetate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8694727     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140141005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  19 in total

Review 1.  Immunosuppression in uveitis therapy.

Authors:  R N Van Gelder; H J Kaplan
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Locally administered ocular corticosteroids: benefits and risks.

Authors:  Charles N J McGhee; Simon Dean; Helen Danesh-Meyer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Feline glaucoma--a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Gillian J McLellan; Paul E Miller
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.644

4.  Treating Sjögren's Syndrome: Insights for the Clinician.

Authors:  Claudio Vitali; Gianluigi Palombi; Pierluigi Cataleta
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Rimexolone 1% versus prednisolone acetate in preventing early postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sevim Kavuncu; Hasan Horoz; Aylin Ardagil; Hasan H Erbil
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Efficacy and safety of rimexolone 1% versus prednisolone acetate 1% in the control of postoperative inflammation following phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Volkan Yaylali; Davut Ozbay; Sinan Tatlipinar; Cem Yildirim; Serap Ozden
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Comparison of prednisolone 1%, rimexolone 1% and ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after cataract extraction: a prospective, randomized, double-masked study.

Authors:  Christoph Hirneiss; Aljoscha S Neubauer; Anselm Kampik; Carl-Ludwig Schönfeld
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Clinical Applications of Dexamethasone for Aged Eyes.

Authors:  Beatriz Abadia; Pilar Calvo; Antonio Ferreras; Fran Bartol; Guayente Verdes; Luis Pablo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Little evidence for association of the glaucoma gene MYOC with open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Seongsoo Sohn; Wonhee Hur; Young Ran Choi; Yun Shin Chung; Chang-Seok Ki; Changwon Kee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The variant N363S of glucocorticoid receptor in steroid-induced ocular hypertension in Hungarian patients treated with photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Viktória Szabó; Gábor Borgulya; Tamás Filkorn; Judit Majnik; Ilona Bányász; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.