Literature DB >> 8694559

C-erbB-2 oncoprotein in the sera and tissue of patients with breast cancer. Utility in prognosis.

R Molina1, J Jo, X Filella, G Zanon, J Pahisa, M Muñoz, B Farrus, M L Latre, N Gimenez, M Hage, J Estape, A M Ballesta.   

Abstract

C-erbB-2 serum levels were studied in the sera of 50 healthy subjects, 56 patients with benign breast diseases and 412 patients with breast cancer. Using 15 U/ml as the cut-off, no healthy subjects, patients with benign disease and only 2.4% of patients with no-evidence of disease had serum levels higher than this cut-off point. Abnormal c-erbB-2 levels were found in 9.2% of the patients with locoregional breast carcinoma and in 45.4% of those with advanced disease. C-erbB-2 serum levels in patients with locoregional breast cancer were not related to tumor size or nodal involvement. By contrast, significantly higher c-erbB-2 serum levels were found in ER- or PgR- tumors than in those ER+ or PgR+ tumors, in both locoregional or metastatic tumors. The correlation between serum and tissue levels of C-erbB-2 was studied in the tumors of 161 patients. Significantly higher c-erbB-2 serum levels were found in patients with overexpression in tissue by immunohistochemistry, in both locoregional and advanced disease (p = 0.0001). In patients with C-erbB-2 overexpression in tissue, c-erbB-2 serum levels were related to tumor size and nodes, with higher values in tumors greater than 5 cm or in those with more than 3 nodes involved. When the prognostic value of this oncoprotein was evaluated, patients with abnormally high presurgical c-erbB-2 had a worse prognosis than those patients with normal values, in both node-negative and node-positive patients. Serum concentrations in patients with advanced disease, were related to the site of recurrence with significantly higher values in patients with metastases (mainly in those with liver metastases) than in those with locoregional recurrence. In summary, c-erbB-2 serum level seem to be a useful tumor marker in the prognosis of patients with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8694559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  10 in total

1.  Expression of molecular biomarkers in primary breast tumors implanted into a surrogate host: increased levels of cyclins correlate with tumor progression.

Authors:  G Wani; I Noyes; G E Milo; S M D'Ambrosio
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.354

2.  Evaluation of tumor markers (HER-2/neu oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15.3) in patients with locoregional breast cancer: prognostic value.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Jose M Augé; Jose M Escudero; Xavier Filella; Gabriel Zanon; Jaume Pahisa; Blanca Farrus; Montserrat Muñoz; Martin Velasco
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-04-02

3.  Serum HER2 levels determined by two methods in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Seigo Nakamura; Yasuharu Tokuda; Hiroshi Yagata; Atsushi Yoshida; Hidekazu Ota; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Massimo Cristofanilli; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Challenges in the clinical utility of the serum test for HER2 ECD.

Authors:  Lian Lam; Nicholas McAndrew; Marla Yee; Ting Fu; Julia C Tchou; Hongtao Zhang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-04-03

5.  ErbB2 immune response in breast cancer patients with soluble receptor ectodomain.

Authors:  V Visco; R Bei; E Moriconi; W Gianni; M H Kraus; R Muraro
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  A Phenomic Perspective on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Treatment: Integrating Aging and Lifestyle in Blood and Tissue Biomarker Profiling.

Authors:  Ainhoa Arana Echarri; Mark Beresford; John P Campbell; Robert H Jones; Rachel Butler; Kenneth J Gollob; Patricia C Brum; Dylan Thompson; James E Turner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  HER-2 gene amplification can be acquired as breast cancer progresses.

Authors:  Songdong Meng; Debasish Tripathy; Sanjay Shete; Raheela Ashfaq; Barbara Haley; Steve Perkins; Peter Beitsch; Amanullah Khan; David Euhus; Cynthia Osborne; Eugene Frenkel; Susan Hoover; Marilyn Leitch; Edward Clifford; Ellen Vitetta; Larry Morrison; Dorothee Herlyn; Leon W M M Terstappen; Timothy Fleming; Tanja Fehm; Thomas Tucker; Nancy Lane; Jianqiang Wang; Jonathan Uhr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Serum tumour markers as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in Libyan breast cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed Elfagieh; Fathi Abdalla; Asma Gliwan; Jamela Boder; Wafa Nichols; Abdelbaset Buhmeida
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-09-05

9.  Serum HER2 level measured by dot blot: a valid and inexpensive assay for monitoring breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Li-Duan Tan; Yuan-Yuan Xu; Yue Yu; Xiao-Qing Li; Ying Chen; Yu-Mei Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Determination of HER2 status using both serum HER2 levels and circulating tumor cells in patients with recurrent breast cancer whose primary tumor was HER2 negative or of unknown HER2 status.

Authors:  Tanja Fehm; Sven Becker; Silke Duerr-Stoerzer; Karl Sotlar; Volkmar Mueller; Diethelm Wallwiener; Nancy Lane; Erich Solomayer; Jonathan Uhr
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.