Literature DB >> 8694357

Effect of propofol on affective state as assessed by place conditioning paradigm in rats.

L Pain1, P Oberling, G Sandner, G Di Scala.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether propofol produces a pleasant affective state remains unclear from clinical studies. In the current study, the effect on affective state of subanesthetic and anesthetic doses of propofol was assessed at a preclinical level with rats in a place conditioning paradigm. Propofol was compared with methohexital.
METHODS: In the place conditioning paradigm, propofol-induced effect was repeatedly paired with one of two distinguishable compartments of the apparatus, whereas the vehicle-induced effect was repeatedly paired with the other compartment. During a subsequent free-choice test, a preference for the drug-paired compartment over the vehicle-paired compartment would be indicative of pleasant state induced by the drug. For all experiments, the conditioning session lasted 8 days and consisted of four pairings of the drug with one compartment and four pairings of the equivalent volume of vehicle with the other compartment. In experiment 1A, four groups of rats were designated according to the dose of propofol that they received intraperitoneally: 0,30,60, or 90 mg/kg. In experiment 1B, the same procedure was used with subanesthetic doses of intraperitoneal methohexital: 0,10,20, or 30 mg/kg. In experiment 2, the rats were conditioned during the recovery period from short-term anesthesia. For one group, anesthesia was induced by propofol (100 mg/kg) whereas for the other group, anesthesia was induced by an equivalent anesthetic dose of methohexital (40 mg/kg).
RESULTS: In experiment 1A, the 30-mg/kg, 60-mg/kg, and 90-mg/kg groups showed a place preference for the drug-paired compartment, but only the group conditioned with 60 mg/kg propofol significantly differed from the 0-mg/kg group. In experiment 1B, the groups conditioned with methohexital showed no place preference for the drug-paired compartment. In experiment 2, the rats showed a place preference for the compartment in which they recovered from propofol-induced anesthesia but no place preference for the compartment in which they recovered from methohexital-induced anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol, but not methohexital, induced a pleasant affective state in rats at subanesthetic doses as well as during recovery from an anesthetic dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8694357     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199607000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  15 in total

1.  Differential involvement of GABAA and GABAB receptors in propofol self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Ben-fu Wang; Miao-jun Lai; Fu-qiang Zhang; Xiao-wei Yang; Wen-hua Zhou; Qing-quan Lian
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Upregulation of DeltaFosB by propofol in rat nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Ming Xiong; Jingyuan Li; Jiang H Ye; Chunxiang Zhang
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Behavioral and toxicological effects of propofol.

Authors:  Michael B Gatch; Michael J Forster
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Propofol use for sedation or sedation for propofol use?

Authors:  Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase in Nucleus Accumbens Mediates Propofol Self-Administration in Rats.

Authors:  Benfu Wang; Xiaowei Yang; Anna Sun; Lanman Xu; Sicong Wang; Wenxuan Lin; Miaojun Lai; Huaqiang Zhu; Wenhua Zhou; Qingquan Lian
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 6.  Clinical effects and lethal and forensic aspects of propofol.

Authors:  Richard J Levy
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.832

7.  Effects of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and propofol on acetylcholine release in the rat cerebral cortex in vivo.

Authors:  Chiaki Nemoto; Masahiro Murakawa; Takahiro Hakozaki; Tuyoshi Imaizumi; Tuyoshi Isosu; Shinju Obara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Propofol sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy arouses euphoria in a large subset of patients.

Authors:  Thorsten Brechmann; Christoph Maier; Miriam Kaisler; Jan Vollert; Wolff Schmiegel; Svetlana Pak; Norbert Scherbaum; Fred Rist; Andrea Riphaus
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Assessing the Value of the Zebrafish Conditioned Place Preference Model for Predicting Human Abuse Potential.

Authors:  A J Brock; S M G Goody; A N Mead; A Sudwarts; M O Parker; C H Brennan
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Dependence potential of propofol: behavioral pharmacology in rodents.

Authors:  Hye Jin Cha; Ji-Hun Cha; Hea-Young Cho; Eun-Yong Chung; Kyoung-Jin Kwon; Jun Yeon Lee; Ho-Sang Jeong; Hye-Soo Kim; Hye-Joo Chung; Eun Jung Kim
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.