Literature DB >> 8694302

The effects of albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch solution on cardiorespiratory and circulatory variables in critically ill patients.

J Boldt1, M Heesen, M Müller, M Pabsdorf, G Hempelmann.   

Abstract

Sufficient intravascular fluid therapy is of major importance in the treatment of the critically ill patient. The present study assessed whether the cardiorespiratory response of long-term volume replacement with low-molecular weight (LMW) hydroxyethyl starch solution (HES) differs from that of human albumin (HA). According to a randomized sequence, 30 trauma patients (injury severity score [ISS] between 15 and 30) and 30 sepsis patients (secondary to major general surgery) received either 10% HES (mean molecular weight 200,000 daltons; HES trauma [n = 15], HES sepsis [n = 15]) or human albumin 20% (HA trauma [n = 15], HA sepsis [n = 15]) over 5 days to keep pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) between 12 and 18 mm Hg. Cardiorespiratory variables were measured by a pulmonary artery catheter on the day of inclusion into the study and daily during the next 5 days. Gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) was measured by tonometry. Central venous pressure and PCWP were comparable within the subgroups (trauma/sepsis) throughout the entire study period. In the trauma patients, cardiac index (CI), oxygen consumption index (VO2I), and oxygen delivery index (DO2I), significantly increased only in the HES-treated patients. In the sepsis patients, CI, VO2I, and DO2I increased and remained higher than baseline only in the HES group (P < 0.01). Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was reduced (< 40%) in the HA patients and increased only in the HES patients (from 34% +/- 4% to 42% +/- 3%; P < 0.05). pHi remained normal (> 7.35) in both trauma groups and in the HES-treated sepsis patients. In the HA sepsis group, pH, decreased (> 7.20) within the study period (7.15 +/- 0.12 on Day 4), indicating deteriorated splanchnic perfusion. We conclude that long-term intravascular fluid therapy with HA in traumatized and sepsis patients has no advantages in comparison to LMW-HES. In both groups, volume replacement with HES even resulted in improved systemic hemodynamics. Decrease in pHi in the sepsis patients was blunted by HES infusion indicating improved splanchnic perfusion by this regimen of volume therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8694302     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199608000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  19 in total

Review 1.  The impact of fluid therapy on microcirculation and tissue oxygenation in hypovolemic patients: a review.

Authors:  Joachim Boldt; Can Ince
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Verheij; Arthur van Lingen; Albertus Beishuizen; Herman M T Christiaans; Jan R de Jong; Armand R J Girbes; Willem Wisselink; Jan A Rauwerda; Marinus A J M Huybregts; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions. Comparing different studies is difficult.

Authors:  J Watts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

4.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Volume expansion of albumin, gelatin, hydroxyethyl starch, saline and erythrocytes after haemorrhage in the rat.

Authors:  Johan Persson; Per-Olof Grände
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  Frances Bunn; Daksha Trivedi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

Review 7.  Colloid solutions: a clinical update.

Authors:  Tomi T Niemi; Ryo Miyashita; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Salt of the earth or a drop in the ocean? A pathophysiological approach to fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  P Gosling
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Greater cardiac response of colloid than saline fluid loading in septic and non-septic critically ill patients with clinical hypovolaemia.

Authors:  Ronald J Trof; Sharwan P Sukul; Jos W R Twisk; Armand R J Girbes; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Effects of fluid challenge on gastric mucosal PCO2 in septic patients.

Authors:  Eliézer Silva; Daniel De Backer; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.