Literature DB >> 8694010

Comparison of five body-composition methods in peritoneal dialysis patients.

S H Stall1, N S Ginsberg, M V DeVita, P M Zabetakis, R I Lynn, G W Gleim, J Wang, R N Pierson, M F Michelis.   

Abstract

Body-composition assessment is an important method of evaluating nutritional status in peritoneal dialysis patients. Because body-composition measurement estimates have not been fully validated in this population, we assessed five body-composition methods in 30 well-dialyzed peritoneal dialysis patients. The techniques studied included bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, total-body potassium counting, and anthropometry by two techniques. The dialysis patients were matched for age, race, sex, height, weight, and body mass index with 29 healthy control subjects in our laboratory database. By 5 x 2 x 2 analysis of variance, significant differences were found between results by modality (P < 0.0001) as well as by sex, with women having an increased percentage of fat (P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant intermethod difference by condition (peritoneal dialysis or control). That is, although significantly different percentage fat values were found between the body-composition techniques, this variability was independent of whether the measurement was made on control or peritoneal dialysis patients. Despite the differences between modalities, all techniques were found to correlate significantly with each other (P < 0.01 or better for men and P < 0.001 or better for women). Our experience shows that these routine techniques for measuring body composition can be readily applied to stable peritoneal dialysis patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8694010     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/64.2.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  6 in total

1.  Comparing body composition assessment tests in long-term hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Rachelle Bross; Gangadarshni Chandramohan; Csaba P Kovesdy; Antigone Oreopoulos; Nazanin Noori; Sarah Golden; Deborah Benner; Joel D Kopple; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Measuring body composition using the bioelectrical impedance method can predict the outcomes of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with pancreatobiliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Mami Muramatsu; Aya Tsuchiya; Seiko Ohta; Yukie Iijima; Miyuki Maruyama; Yoshiko Onodera; Megumi Hagihara; Naoki Nakaya; Itaru Sato; Kenji Omura; Soichiro Ueno; Hideo Nakajima
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Bioimpedance spectroscopy for the estimation of fat-free mass in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Sara M Vine; Patricia L Painter; Michael A Kuskowski; Carrie P Earthman
Journal:  E Spen Eur E J Clin Nutr Metab       Date:  2011-02-01

4.  The comparative evaluation of patients' body dry weight under hemodialysis using two methods: Bioelectrical impedance analysis and conventional method.

Authors:  Neda Alijanian; Afsoon Emami Naini; Shahrzad Shahidi; Lida Liaghat; Rahil Riahi Samani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  The normal range of body mass index with high body fat percentage among male residents of Lucknow city in north India.

Authors:  Chandrasekharan Nair Kesavachandran; Vipin Bihari; Neeraj Mathur
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Comparison of experimental and bioelectrical impedance analysis methods in calculation of dry weight in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  A Emami Naini; J Savoj; A Atapoor; M Mortazavi; Sh Taheri
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2012-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.