Literature DB >> 8693548

Comparison of conventional oral cyclosporine and cyclosporine microemulsion formulations in children with a liver transplant.

K Hoppu1, H Jalanko, J Laine, C Holmberg.   

Abstract

We studied 22 children (mean age: 8.42 years, range: 1.9-15.6 years) with a liver transplant to compare the pharmacokinetics of oral cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion to the conventional formulation. The CsA treatment (mean dose: 5.9 mg/kg/day, range: 3.0-11.7 mg/kg/day) was converted 1:1 on a milligram-to-milligram basis to the microemulsion formulation. Five days after the conversion, the mean peak blood CsA concentration was higher (microemulsion: 963 ng/ml, range: 518-1864 ng/ml; conventional: 431 ng/ml, range: 98-888 ng/ml; P<0.0001) and it was reached faster (median time of peak concentration: 1.6 hr vs. 2.9 hr, range: 1.0-3.0 hr vs. 1.9-4.0 hr; P=0.0009). The absorption lasted on the average 19% longer after the conventional formulation. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) was larger after the microemulsion formulation in all but one patient (P=0.001) by a mean factor of 1.80 (range: 0.72-3.04). The trough CsA level after the microemulsion formulation was more closely related to peak concentration (r2=0.86 vs. 0.45) and AUC (r2=0.84 vs. 0.47); thus, therapeutic drug monitoring may be more useful. After 6 months on the new formulation, the results for the whole group were similar, but in five children the AUC was comparable to the AUC obtained with the conventional formulation. No rejections occurred, and the liver and kidney functions remained unchanged. A 1:1 conversion can be safely performed in children, based on a 6-month follow-up. However, the total drug exposure changes in significant ways, which, on a long-term basis, may improve the immunosuppression in an underimmunosuppressed patient, but may increase the risk for dose-related adverse effects in others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8693548     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199607150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in paediatric transplant recipients.

Authors:  G F Cooney; K Habucky; K Hoppu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral). A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  A J Coukell; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral)1 in organ transplantation.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A J Wagstaff; C M Perry; G L Plosker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.