Literature DB >> 8693051

Action planning during the presentation of stimulus sequences: effects of compatible and incompatible stimuli.

J Müsseler1, W Prinz.   

Abstract

Experimental designs that require the simultaneous perception and reproduction of a stimulus sequence could help to clarify the relationship between perception and action. This contribution examines a specific stimulus-response compatibility with the reproduction of simple stimulus sequences. In the procedure a response just prepared or one to be prepared is confronted with a new incoming stimulus that is compatible or incompatible with the response. Interference is predicted from a framework in which stimulus perception and action control are assumed to share common codes. Five arrows were successively presented at 1-s intervals. The arrows pointed either to the left or to the right with equal probability. One of the five arrows was accompanied by a randomly presented go signal. Subjects then had to reproduce the sequence by pressing corresponding left or right keys while the stimulus presentation continued. Reaction-time latencies and reaction intervals within a sequence were analyzed in six experiments. Results showed increasing reaction-time latencies the later the go signal was presented--that is, the longer the sequence to be reproduced was. In contrast to previous findings, this effect interacted with the compatibility between the arrow displayed together with the go signal and the first reaction. It is argued that the go signal initiates a transfer of a cognitive action plan to a peripheral motor program and that this process is subject to interference the more the current stimulus is at odds with one of the first parameter specification.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8693051     DOI: 10.1007/bf00419833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  14 in total

1.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

2.  Use of simple reaction time in motor programming studies: a reply to Klapp, Wyatt and Lingo.

Authors:  F M Henry
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Excerpt from Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele by Dr Rudolph Hermann Lotze.

Authors:  G E Berrios
Journal:  Hist Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03

4.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

Review 5.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes.

Authors:  Ritske de Jong; Michael G H Coles; Gordon D Logan; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  J Müsseler; B Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation.

Authors:  J R Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

9.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

10.  [Anticipation of rhythmic stimuli. Speed of establishment and accuracy of synchronization].

Authors:  P Fraisse
Journal:  Annee Psychol       Date:  1966
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.