Literature DB >> 8690821

Pharmacodynamics of torsemide administered as an intravenous injection and as a continuous infusion to patients with congestive heart failure.

W G Kramer1, W B Smith, J Ferguson, T Serpas, A G Grant, P K Black, D C Brater.   

Abstract

The natriuretic and diuretic effects of a 100-mg dose of torsemide administered as a continuous infusion of torsemide and as a single bolus were compared in a group of patients with stable mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure (CHF). Patients received in random order 100 mg of torsemide as an intravenous bolus and as a 75-mg infusion over 24 hours started simultaneously with a 25-mg loading bolus. Administration of torsemide to patients with CHF as a continuous infusion was an effective dosing regimen, resulting in 24-hour diuresis and natriuresis that was numerically but not statistically greater than that observed with bolus administration. The response with continuous infusion occurred with less torsemide in the urine, resulting in a significantly greater efficiency of torsemide with this regimen. The effectiveness of torsemide as a continuous infusion does not mean that this mode of administration should be used in all patients. The response to 100 mg of torsemide in patients with mild-to-moderate CHF is the same whether administered as an intravenous bolus, a continuous intravenous infusion, or by mouth. This is consistent with the high bioavailability demonstrated in previous studies. The mode of therapy used should be dictated by each individual patient's needs. This study shows that continuous infusion is a viable option for administration of torsemide, and dosing guidelines for use of such a strategy are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8690821     DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04197.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  8 in total

1.  Continuous versus intermittent administration of furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akira Kuriyama; Seigo Urushidani
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Diuretic therapy in acute decompensated heart failure--bolus or continuous?

Authors:  Pankaj Jariwala; Saratchandra Koduganti
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014 May-Jun

Review 3.  The efficiency concept in pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  G Alván; G Paintaud; M Wakelkamp
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Torasemide: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  M Young; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Diuretic dosing in acute decompensated heart failure: lessons from DOSE.

Authors:  Patrick T Campbell; Jason Ryan
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-09

Review 6.  Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  D R K Salvador; N R Rey; G C Ramos; F E R Punzalan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

Review 7.  Loop diuretics in acute decompensated heart failure: necessary? Evil? A necessary evil?

Authors:  G Michael Felker; Christopher M O'Connor; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of loop diuretic therapy in acute decompensated heart failure: a clinical review.

Authors:  Laura Leto; Nadia Aspromonte; Mauro Feola
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.214

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.