Literature DB >> 8690553

Assessment of waiting time and priority setting by means of a national register.

M Lundström1, U Stenevi, W Thorburn.   

Abstract

To increase access to care for cataract patients in Sweden, it was decided, starting in 1992, that all cataract patients listed for surgery and with priority should have their cataract extraction performed within three months. To evaluate the effect of this waiting time guarantee, a National Cataract Register (NCR) was initiated in late 1991. In 1992, 81% of all cataract extractions performed in Sweden were reported to the NCR; in 1993 this figure was 92%. Reasons for this high participation ratio are discussed. In 1993, 74.4% (range between different clinics, 40-99%) of the patients with priority had their operation performed within three months. Great variation in visual acuity and age was found in patients with priority among the different surgical units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8690553     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300009454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  8 in total

1.  Points for pain: waiting list priority scoring systems.

Authors:  R T Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-13

2.  Outcome of cataract surgery considering the preoperative situation: a study of possible predictors of the functional outcome.

Authors:  M Lundström; U Stenevi; W Thorburn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  The Manitoba Cataract Waiting List Program.

Authors:  L Bellan; M Mathen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  William Hodge; Tanya Horsley; David Albiani; Julia Baryla; Michel Belliveau; Ralf Buhrmann; Michael O'Connor; Jason Blair; Elizabeth Lowcock
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting list.

Authors:  B L Conner-Spady; S Sanmugasunderam; P Courtright; J J McGurran; T W Noseworthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Unmet needs and waiting list prioritization for knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mercè Comas; Rubén Román; José Maria Quintana; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times.

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Pomey; Pierre-Gerlier Forest; Claudia Sanmartin; Carolyn Decoster; Nathalie Clavel; Elaine Warren; Madeleine Drew; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Geographical variations in the benefit of applying a prioritization system for cataract surgery in different regions of Spain.

Authors:  Rubén Román; Mercè Comas; Javier Mar; Enrique Bernal; Alberto Jiménez-Puente; Santiago Gutiérrez-Moreno; Xavier Castells
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.