Literature DB >> 8690551

A cost-utility analysis of laser-assisted angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusions.

M Sculpher1, J Michaels, M McKenna, J Minor.   

Abstract

Despite the perception of many people that lasers represent the cutting edge of high-technology medicine, this form of medical technology has been subject to relatively little rigorous evaluation. This dearth of research relates particularly to economic evaluation, where there have been few attempts to justify the high cost of laser equipment. This paper details an economic evaluation of the use of laser technology as a secondary adjunct to angioplasty to treat peripheral arterial occlusions. Using data from a range of sources, including a published randomized trial, a cost-utility model is developed to estimate the costs and benefits of the laser, relative to standard angioplasty. The best available data indicate a cost-effective role for the laser, but important areas of uncertainty exist, including the laser's secondary recanalization rate, which has been estimated on the basis of limited numbers of patients. This uncertainty suggests that further research is required before widespread diffusion of the laser for use in this clinical context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8690551     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300009430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessing quality in decision analytic cost-effectiveness models. A suggested framework and example of application.

Authors:  M Sculpher; E Fenwick; K Claxton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Testing the validity of cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  C McCabe; S Dixon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation.

Authors:  A Briggs; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Decision analysis and the implementation of research findings.

Authors:  R J Lilford; S G Pauker; D A Braunholtz; J Chard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

5.  Strategies for the management of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Amanda R Patrick; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jerry Avorn; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-effectiveness of superficial femoral artery endovascular interventions in the UK and Germany: a modelling study.

Authors:  Benjamin C Kearns; Steven M Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Discrete Event Simulation Model for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Screening for Asymptomatic Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease.

Authors:  Vojtěch Kamenský; Vladimír Rogalewicz; Ondřej Gajdoš; Gleb Donin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.