AIMS: We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of transthoracic core biopsy using an automated biopsy gun and compared the findings with those of aspiration needle biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients underwent 74 core biopsy procedures and 50 patients underwent 52 aspiration biopsy procedures. Of these, a final diagnosis was obtained in 107 lesions with surgery or clinical course. Fifteen patients in which a final diagnosis was not obtained were excluded from the study on diagnostic accuracy. Thus, in the study of diagnostic accuracy, 63 core biopsy procedures for 62 lesions are included. Core biopsy was performed with an 18 G cutting needle using an automated biopsy gun. Aspiration biopsy was performed with a 20 G aspiration needle. RESULTS: Core biopsy yielded sufficient material in 57/63 procedures (90.5%). A correct diagnosis was obtained in 36 procedures (85.7%) for malignant leisons and a specific benign diagnosis was obtained in 11 procedures (52.4%). Aspiration biopsy yielded a correct diagnosis in 26 procedures (81.3%) for malignant leisons and in seven (46.7%) for benign lesions. The overall correct diagnosis were 75.8% and 71.7% with core biopsy and aspiration biopsy, respectively. Core biopsy gave a higher predictive rate than that of aspiration biopsy for both benign and malignant lessons (P < 0.02). Pneumothorax occurred in 18/74 (24.3%) patients with core biopsy and in 18/45 (40.0%) patients with aspiration biopsy. Of these, three with core biopsy and two with aspiration biopsy needed tube drainage. The other complication was haemoptysis, which occurred in six patients following core biopsy and in three after aspiration biopsy. All nine cases subsided spontaneously. There were no fatal complications. CONCLUSIONS: Core biopsy with a biopsy gun increase the diagnostic accuracy with a higher histologic predictive rate and no obvious additional risk of complications.
AIMS: We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of transthoracic core biopsy using an automated biopsy gun and compared the findings with those of aspiration needle biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients underwent 74 core biopsy procedures and 50 patients underwent 52 aspiration biopsy procedures. Of these, a final diagnosis was obtained in 107 lesions with surgery or clinical course. Fifteen patients in which a final diagnosis was not obtained were excluded from the study on diagnostic accuracy. Thus, in the study of diagnostic accuracy, 63 core biopsy procedures for 62 lesions are included. Core biopsy was performed with an 18 G cutting needle using an automated biopsy gun. Aspiration biopsy was performed with a 20 G aspiration needle. RESULTS: Core biopsy yielded sufficient material in 57/63 procedures (90.5%). A correct diagnosis was obtained in 36 procedures (85.7%) for malignant leisons and a specific benign diagnosis was obtained in 11 procedures (52.4%). Aspiration biopsy yielded a correct diagnosis in 26 procedures (81.3%) for malignant leisons and in seven (46.7%) for benign lesions. The overall correct diagnosis were 75.8% and 71.7% with core biopsy and aspiration biopsy, respectively. Core biopsy gave a higher predictive rate than that of aspiration biopsy for both benign and malignant lessons (P < 0.02). Pneumothorax occurred in 18/74 (24.3%) patients with core biopsy and in 18/45 (40.0%) patients with aspiration biopsy. Of these, three with core biopsy and two with aspiration biopsy needed tube drainage. The other complication was haemoptysis, which occurred in six patients following core biopsy and in three after aspiration biopsy. All nine cases subsided spontaneously. There were no fatal complications. CONCLUSIONS: Core biopsy with a biopsy gun increase the diagnostic accuracy with a higher histologic predictive rate and no obvious additional risk of complications.
Authors: A Manhire; M Charig; C Clelland; F Gleeson; R Miller; H Moss; K Pointon; C Richardson; E Sawicka Journal: Thorax Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Anastasia Oikonomou; Frederick R Matzinger; Jean M Seely; Carole J Dennie; Peter J Macleod Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 5.315