Literature DB >> 8688984

Relating spontaneous adverse experience reports to scores on a questionnaire querying tolerability.

B L Barber1, N C Santanello.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the relation between spontaneously reported adverse experiences and responses given on the comparison of ophthalmic medications for tolerability (COMTOL) checklist questionnaire which queries the frequency and bother of specific side-effects known to be associated with topical ophthalmic agents used to treat ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma, and the impact that the side-effects have on health-related quality of life. The study was a 4-week, randomized, open-label, two-period cross-over clinical trial comparing dorzolamide and pilocarpine in 92 patients who were also receiving timolol for the treatment of ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Patients completed the COMTOL questionnaire at baseline and at the end of each period and spontaneous reports of adverse experiences (AEs) were collected throughout the study by the investigator. Since there were only 3 spontaneously reported AEs related to drug treatment while patients received dorzolamide and since COMTOL scores indicated a low level of side-effects, the analyses were limited to pilocarpine treatment periods. We discovered that during the pilocarpine treatment periods, a large percentage (94%) of the 47 patients, who failed to spontaneously report any adverse experiences, indicated on the COMTOL that they had experienced side-effects. These discrepancies between the methods of spontaneous reports and a checklist questionnaire are similar to those previously reported in the literature for other drugs. Unlike previous literature, we went beyond identifying discrepancies with the two reporting methods and we looked for possible explanations for why the discrepancies existed. We discovered that patients who spontaneously reported AEs expressed more bother from these specific side-effects on the questionnaire than patients who did not spontaneously report AEs. As well, patients who spontaneously reported AEs and discontinued drug as a result of the AEs expressed on the COMTOL the greatest bother from side-effects. This trend of increasing negative impact (as patients reported AEs and discontinued) was also observed with COMTOL global question scores on the impact of side-effects on health-related quality of life, the impact of activity limitations on quality of life, satisfaction with medication and compliance with medication. Therefore, spontaneous reporting of side-effects appears to be detecting the most clinically meaningful side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8688984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  8 in total

Review 1.  Systemic adverse effects of topical ophthalmic agents. Implications for older patients.

Authors:  J P Diamond
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments.

Authors:  Jemaima Che Hamzah; Jennifer M Burr; Craig R Ramsay; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Maria Prior
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Vision related quality of life and topical glaucoma treatment side effects.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Nordmann; Nadia Auzanneau; Séverine Ricard; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Bradyarrhythmias secondary to topical levobunolol hydrochloride solution.

Authors:  Lianjun Lin; Yuchuan Wang; Yan Chen; Meilin Liu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Working towards consensus on methods used to elicit participant-reported safety data in uncomplicated malaria clinical drug studies: a Delphi technique study.

Authors:  Nyaradzo Mandimika; Karen I Barnes; Clare I R Chandler; Cheryl Pace; Elizabeth N Allen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 6.  Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Allen; Clare Ir Chandler; Nyaradzo Mandimika; Cordelia Leisegang; Karen Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-16

7.  How experiences become data: the process of eliciting adverse event, medical history and concomitant medication reports in antimalarial and antiretroviral interaction trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Allen; Adiel K Mushi; Isolide S Massawe; Lasse S Vestergaard; Martha Lemnge; Sarah G Staedke; Ushma Mehta; Karen I Barnes; Clare I R Chandler
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Evaluating harm associated with anti-malarial drugs: a survey of methods used by clinical researchers to elicit, assess and record participant-reported adverse events and related data.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Allen; Clare I R Chandler; Nyaradzo Mandimika; Cheryl Pace; Ushma Mehta; Karen I Barnes
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.979

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.