Literature DB >> 8688344

A randomised comparison of a third-generation regimen (PACEBOM) with a standard regimen (CHOP) in patients with histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a British National Lymphoma Investigation report.

D C Linch1, B Vaughan Hudson, B W Hancock, P J Hoskin, D C Cunningham, A C Newland, D W Milligan, P A Stevenson, J K Wood, K A MacLennan, L Anderson, W M Gregory, G Vaughan Hudson.   

Abstract

A combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) has been a standard therapy for histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas for over 20 years, but several newer regimens, referred to as second or third generation, have been reported to give improved results in single-centre studies. Positive evidence from randomised trials has been lacking, and the British National Lymphoma Investigation therefore commenced a randomised comparison of CHOP vs a third-generation regimen, PACEBOM, in November 1987. A total of 459 eligible patients were entered into the trial: 226 in the CHOP arm and 233 in the PACEBOM arm. Overall, there was no significant difference in outcome between the two arms of the trial. In patients with stage IV disease there was an apparent improvement in survival for those treated with PACEBOM, but considerable caution must be exercised with such subgroup analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8688344      PMCID: PMC2074593          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  14 in total

1.  Identification of major prognostic subgroups of patients with large-cell lymphoma treated with m-BACOD or M-BACOD.

Authors:  M A Shipp; D P Harrington; M M Klatt; M S Jochelson; G S Pinkus; J L Marshall; D S Rosenthal; A T Skarin; G P Canellos
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  R I Fisher; E R Gaynor; S Dahlberg; M M Oken; T M Grogan; E M Mize; J H Glick; C A Coltman; T P Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Two epipodophyllotoxin derivatives, VM 26 and VP 16213, in the treatment of leukemias, hematosarcomas, and lymphomas.

Authors:  G Mathé; L Schwarzenberg; P Pouillart; R Oldham; R Weiner; C Jasmin; C Rosenfeld; M Hayat; J L Misset; M Musset; M Schneider; J L Amiel; F De Vassal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  The chemotherapy of lymphomas: looking back, moving forward--the Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation award lecture.

Authors:  V T De Vita; S M Hubbard; D L Longo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J H Goldie; A J Coldman; G A Gudauskas
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1982-03

6.  MACOP-B chemotherapy for the treatment of diffuse large-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  P Klimo; J M Connors
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Evaluation of VP-16-213 in malignant lymphoma and melanoma.

Authors:  J W Cecil; J M Quagliana; C A Coltman; M Al-Sarraf; T Thigpen; C W Groppe
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-05

8.  Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  E M McKelvey; J A Gottlieb; H E Wilson; A Haut; R W Talley; R Stephens; M Lane; J F Gamble; S E Jones; P N Grozea; J Gutterman; C Coltman; T E Moon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Diffuse aggressive lymphomas: increased survival after alternating flexible sequences of proMACE and MOPP chemotherapy.

Authors:  R I Fisher; V T DeVita; S M Hubbard; D L Longo; R Wesley; B A Chabner; R C Young
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial investigating the survival benefit of dose-intensified multidrug combination chemotherapy (LSG9) for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9002.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kinoshita; Tomomitsu Hotta; Kensei Tobinai; Tohru Kobayashi; Naoki Ishizuka; Masao Tomonaga; Toshiaki Sai; Youichiro Ohno; Masaharu Kasai; Michinori Ogura; Chikara Mikuni; Hironobu Toki; Masayuki Sano; Yasufumi Masaki; Tomoko Ohtsu; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Takeaki Takenaka; Shigeru Shirakawa; Masanori Shimoyama
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  NHL (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma).

Authors:  Mark Hill; Fiona Kyle
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-11-15

Review 3.  NHL (diffuse large B cell lymphoma).

Authors:  Fiona Kyle; Mark Hill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-01-18

4.  Survival in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing third generation regimens with CHOP.

Authors:  A Messori; M Vaiani; S Trippoli; L Rigacci; M Jerkeman; G Longo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-02-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.