Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs: the validity of experimental "stress profilometry'.

This paper evaluates a technique for measuring the distribution of compressive stress within cadaveric intervertebral discs. A strain-gauged pressure transducer, side-mounted near the tip of a 1.3 mm diameter needle, was inserted into cubes of disc tissue and into intact discs. Regardless of the position and orientation of the transducer within the tissue or disc, its output was found to be proportional to the compressive force applied to the specimen. The distribution of compressive stress was measured by pulling the instrumented needle through the specimen and the resulting stress profiles were reproducible to within 20 per cent. Profiles obtained at different applied loads showed a similar distribution of stress within the disc, suggesting that the compressive stress at any location and direction increased in proportion to the applied load. Since transducer output was also proportional to applied load, it was reasoned that it must be proportional to compressive stress within the disc. The average vertical compressive stresses acting on various regions within a disc were calculated from the stress profiles and multiplied by the cross-sectional area of each region: the resulting force was then compared with the known applied force in order to assess the calibration coefficient of the transducer. Agreement between the two forces was good, indicating that the calibration coefficient established in a saline bath was applicable to disc tissues also. However, artifactual stress peaks could be generated if the transducer was pulled across a bony asperity. It is concluded that the transducer measures the mean compressive stress acting upon it within disc tissues. Errors associated with the technique are small compared to differences in stress distributions which occur naturally, for example when intervertebral discs are loaded to simulate different postures in a living person.