Literature DB >> 8687372

Individual differences in thought suppression. The White Bear Suppression Inventory: factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates.

P Muris1, H Merckelbach, R Horselenberg.   

Abstract

The White Bear Suppression Inventory [WBSI; Wegner, D.M. & Zanakos, S. (1994), Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640] is a self-report questionnaire measuring people's general tendency to suppress unwanted negative thoughts. The current article describes two studies investigating the reliability, factor structure, validity, and correlates of the WBSI. Study 1 (n = 172) showed that the WBSI is a reliable instrument in terms of internal consistency and test-retest stability. Factor analyses of the WBSI revealed a 1-factor solution. Furthermore, the WBSI was found to correlate positively with measures of emotional vulnerability and psychopathological symptoms. In Study 2 (n = 40), the relationship between WBSI and levels of intrusive thinking was examined in more detail, using a thought suppression task. In general, results of this thought suppression experiment provided evidence for the validity of the WBSI. That is, subjects with high WBSI scores exhibited higher frequencies of unwanted intrusive thoughts than subjects with low WBSI scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8687372     DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00005-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  21 in total

1.  Suppressing the White Bears interacts with Anxiety Sensitivity in the prediction of Mood and Anxiety Symptoms.

Authors:  Meghan E Keough; Kiara R Timpano; Christina J Riccardi; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2010-10-01

2.  Evidence for Transdiagnostic Repetitive Negative Thinking and Its Association with Rumination, Worry, and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: A Commonality Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel E Gustavson; Alta du Pont; Mark A Whisman; Akira Miyake
Journal:  Collabra Psychol       Date:  2018-05-17

3.  Gender differences in the experienced emotional intensity of experimentally induced memories of negative scenes.

Authors:  Søren Risløv Staugaard; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-10

4.  Differential predictability of four dimensions of affect intensity.

Authors:  David C Rubin; Rick H Hoyle; Mark R Leary
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-06-27

5.  The Ups and Downs of Cognitive Function: Neuroticism and Negative Affect Drive Performance Inconsistency.

Authors:  Elizabeth Munoz; Robert S Stawski; Martin J Sliwinski; Joshua M Smyth; Stuart W S MacDonald
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Behavioral and neural correlates of memory suppression in PTSD.

Authors:  Danielle R Sullivan; Brian Marx; May S Chen; Brendan E Depue; Scott M Hayes; Jasmeet P Hayes
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  Intraindividual coupling of daily stressors and cognitive interference in old age.

Authors:  Robert S Stawski; Jacqueline Mogle; Martin J Sliwinski
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16.

Authors:  Johan Bjureberg; Brjánn Ljótsson; Matthew T Tull; Erik Hedman; Hanna Sahlin; Lars-Gunnar Lundh; Jonas Bjärehed; David DiLillo; Terri Messman-Moore; Clara Hellner Gumpert; Kim L Gratz
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2015-09-14

9.  Dissociating interference-control processes between memory and response.

Authors:  Patrick G Bissett; Derek Evan Nee; John Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A Preliminary Examination of Thought Suppression, Emotion Regulation, and Coping in a Trauma Exposed Sample.

Authors:  Ananda B Amstadter; Laura L Vernon
Journal:  J Aggress Maltreat Trauma       Date:  2008-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.