Literature DB >> 8687265

Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

C M Coley1, Y H Li, A R Medsger, T J Marrie, M J Fine, W N Kapoor, J R Lave, A S Detsky, M C Weinstein, D E Singer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure preferences for initial outpatient vs hospital care among low-risk patients who were being actively treated for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
METHODS: Study patients included 159 patients with CAP, 57 (36%) initially hospitalized, who were identified as being at low risk for early mortality using a validated prediction model. Subjects were enrolled from university and community health care facilities located in Boston, Mass, Halifax, Nova Scotia, and Pittsburgh, Pa, participating in the Pneumonia Patient Outcome Research Team prospective cohort study of CAP. Three utility assessment techniques (category scaling, standard gamble, and willingness to pay) were used to measure the strength of patient preferences for the site of care for low-risk CAP. At the time of initial therapy or during the early recuperative period, patient preferences were assessed across a spectrum of potential clinical outcomes using 7 standardized pneumonia clinical vignettes.
RESULTS: Responses to the 7 pneumonia scenarios indicated that most patients consistently preferred outpatient-based therapy. This pattern was observed regardless of whether patients had actually been treated initially at home or in a hospital. Patients (74%) who stated that they generally preferred home care for low-risk CAP were willing to pay a mean of 24% of 1 month's household income to be assured of this preference. Preference for home care, as measured by the category scaling and the willingness to pay, persisted after adjustment for sociodemographic and baseline health status covariates. Sixty nine percent of interviewed patients said that their physician alone determined whether they would be treated in the hospital or at home. Only 11% recalled being asked if they had a preference for either site of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients, even those treated initially in a hospital, who were at low risk for mortality from CAP prefer outpatient treatment. However, most physicians appear not to involve patients in the site-of-care decision. More explicit discussion of patient preferences for the location of care would likely yield more highly valued care by patients as well as less costly treatment for CAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8687265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  28 in total

1.  Providing better care for patients who may have pneumonia.

Authors:  W F Holmes; M Woodhead
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; S F Dowell; L A Mandell; T M File; D M Musher; M J Fine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Integrating Physician Services in the Home: evaluation of an innovative program.

Authors:  Moira Stewart; John F Sangster; Bridget L Ryan; Jeffrey S Hoch; Irene Cohen; Carol L McWilliam; Joan Mitchell; Evelyn Vingilis; Christine Tyrrell; Ian R McWhinney
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Authors:  Lionel A Mandell; Richard G Wunderink; Antonio Anzueto; John G Bartlett; G Douglas Campbell; Nathan C Dean; Scott F Dowell; Thomas M File; Daniel M Musher; Michael S Niederman; Antonio Torres; Cynthia G Whitney
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Impact of Standardizing Management of Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Heart Rate in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Ernesto De Leon; Lewei Duan; Ellen Rippenberger; Adam L Sharp
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal screening for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospital inpatients.

Authors:  L Lapointe-Shaw; T Voruganti; P Kohler; H-H Thein; B Sander; A McGeer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Factors associated with the hospitalization of low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia in a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Jose Labarere; Roslyn A Stone; D Scott Obrosky; Donald M Yealy; Thomas P Meehan; Thomas E Auble; Jonathan M Fine; Louis G Graff; Michael J Fine
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Can palliative home care reduce 30-day readmissions? Results of a propensity score matched cohort study.

Authors:  Anjana Ranganathan; Meredith Dougherty; David Waite; David Casarett
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Conjoint analysis of a new Chemotherapy: willingness to pay and preference for the features of raltitrexed versus standard therapy in advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mike Aristides; Jack Chen; Mark Schulz; Eve Williamson; Stephen Clarke; Kaye Grant
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Which patients with lower respiratory tract infections need inpatient treatment? Perceptions of physicians, nurses, patients and relatives.

Authors:  Claudia Baehni; Sabine Meier; Pamela Spreiter; Ursula Schild; Katharina Regez; Rita Bossart; Robert Thomann; Claudine Falconnier; Mirjam Christ-Crain; Sabina De Geest; Beat Müller; Philipp Schuetz
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.