Literature DB >> 8686611

Autologous breast reconstruction with endoscopic latissimus dorsi musculosubcutaneous flaps in patients choosing breast-conserving therapy: mammographic appearance.

D L Monticciolo1, D Ross, J Bostwick, F Eaves, T Styblo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define and evaluate mammographic changes in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy and a new reconstructive technique that uses autologous tissue from a latissimus dorsi musculosubcutaneous flap.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 20 patients who underwent either immediate or delayed endoscopic latissimus dorsi muscle flap reconstruction after lumpectomy, 13 also had postsurgery mammograms available for review. Radiographic findings assessed included skin thickening, density or radiolucency at the reconstruction site, density around the flap, fat necrosis, calcifications, and the presence of surgical clips.
RESULTS: Mammograms for three patients (23%) revealed thickening that we believed was attributable to radiation therapy. No patient had increased density in the flap itself; all flaps were relatively radiolucent centrally (13/13; 100%). Mammograms revealed density around the rim of the flap in four patients (31%). This density was most likely secondary to latissimus dorsi muscle fibers and did not limit radiographic evaluation. One patient had calcifications, probably secondary to fat necrosis. No oil cysts were seen. In the majority of patients (11/13; 85%), surgical clips were visible.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic latissimus dorsi muscle flap reconstruction, previously used only for mastectomy patients, is now being used for improved esthetic outcome in selected patients who desire breast conservation. Our results indicate that the mammographic findings are predictable. The most common findings are relative radiolucency centrally, with or without density from muscle fibers around the edges of the area of tissue transfer. The transplanted musculosubcutaneous flap does not interfere with mammographic evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8686611     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.2.8686611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

Review 1.  New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing?

Authors:  Bohdan Pomahac; Abram Recht; James W May; Charles A Hergrueter; Sumner A Slavin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Imaging Results Following Oncoplastic and Standard Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Ross Dolan; Meera Patel; Eva Weiler-Mithoff; James Mansell; Sheila Stallard; Julie C Doughty; Laszlo Romics
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Oncological Outcomes and Complications After Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast Conservations-The Glasgow Experience.

Authors:  Weiguang Ho; Sheila Stallard; Julie Doughty; Elizabeth Mallon; Laszlo Romics
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-12-19

4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Better after Oncoplastic Breast Conservation than after Mastectomy and Autologous Reconstruction.

Authors:  Natalie D Chand; Victoria Browne; Nirmala Paramanathan; Lashan J Peiris; Siobhan A Laws; Richard M Rainsbury
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-07-24

5.  Oncoplastic Volume Replacement for Breast Cancer: Latissimus Dorsi Flap versus Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap.

Authors:  Emad M Abdelrahman; Ahmed M Nawar; M Ashraf Balbaa; Ahmed A Shoulah; Ahmed A Shora; Mohamed S Kharoub
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.