Literature DB >> 8684526

Low-dose intradermal versus intramuscular hepatitis B vaccination in patients with end-stage renal failure. A preliminary study.

T Mettang1, U Schenk, S Thomas, C Machleidt, T Kiefer, F P Fischer, U Kuhlmann.   

Abstract

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk of hepatitis B infection. Only 50-60% of the patients respond adequately to the routinely performed intramuscular (i.m.) hepatitis B vaccination. We examined whether low dose intradermal (i.d.) application of the vaccine is equivalent to regular i.m. administration. Thirty-two patients with ESRD of different etiologies were investigated at the onset of dialysis treatment [11 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 21 patients on hemodialysis (HD)]. Patients were vaccinated at month 0, 1, 3 and 6 with either 40 micrograms HBs Ag (2 ml Engerix B, 14 patients) i.m. or with 10 micrograms HBsAg (0.5 ml Engerix B, 18 patients) i.d. The i.m. vaccination was applied in the deltoid muscle, while for i.d. vaccination the vaccine was injected into the skin of the deltoid region. Six weeks after the last vaccination anti-HBs titers were measured. 61% (11 patients) of the patients vaccinated i.d. and 64% (9 patients) of the patients vaccinated i.m. developed protective titers. Neither the height of the titers nor the proportion of patients responding to the vaccination differed significantly between the two vaccination schedules. No difference regarding the height of titers achieved or the rate of seroconversion could be found when CAPD and HD patients were analyzed separately. Only minor side effects have been observed. According to these preliminary data i.d. hepatitis B vaccination in patients with ESRD may be equivalent to i.m. administration of the vaccine. Given equivalency i.d. vaccination may be a cost-saving alternative to i.m. vaccination (only a quarter of the dose of i.m. administered vaccine is needed) with a good practicability (vaccination can be performed during HD) and a low rate of side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8684526     DOI: 10.1159/000188841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron        ISSN: 1660-8151            Impact factor:   2.847


  6 in total

Review 1.  Viral hepatitis in elderly haemodialysis patients: current prevention and management strategies.

Authors:  Matthias Girndt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B): a review of its immunogenicity and protective efficacy against hepatitis B.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Stuart Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The duration of hepatitis B vaccine immunity in pediatric dialysis patients.

Authors:  Rita D Sheth; Melissa F Peskin; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  A randomized pilot trial on the effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on antibody response in hemodialysis patients who had not responded to routine hepatitis B virus vaccine.

Authors:  Jamshid Roozbeh; Kamran Bagheri-Lankarani; Poopak Mohaghegh; Ghanbarali Raeesjalali; Saeed Behzadi; Mehdi Sagheb; Mehrdad Vossoughi; Bahar Bastani
Journal:  J Nephropathol       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 5.  Viral hepatitis in hemodialysis: An update.

Authors:  Bassam Bernieh
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 6.  Fractional dose of intradermal compared to intramuscular and subcutaneous vaccination - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenny L Schnyder; Cornelis A De Pijper; Hannah M Garcia Garrido; Joost G Daams; Abraham Goorhuis; Cornelis Stijnis; Frieder Schaumburg; Martin P Grobusch
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 6.211

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.