Literature DB >> 8684104

Decreased fertility in Britain compared with Finland.

M Joffe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been much interest in the apparent decrease in semen quality. Because the evidence for such a decrease is open to criticism, a different type of evidence is needed. Finland seems to have escaped this decrease, as well as other disorders of the male reproductive tract, notably testicular cancer. If there has been a true decrease, the implications for fertility are unknown.
METHODS: The most sensitive functional measure of fertility is time to pregnancy (TTP); this can be studied retrospectively at group level with a high degree of validity. To test the hypothesis that Finnish men are more fertile than British men, TTP distributions from published Finnish studies and data from Britain were compared. Two comparisons were made: a pair of antenatal studies, and a pair of cross-sectional studies.
FINDINGS: In both comparisons, fertility was statistically significantly greater in Finland than in Britain. The findings did not seem to be due to methodological problems; in particular, the results could not be attributed to differences in frequency of intercourse, since this would have had the opposite effect on sperm concentration and on TTP.
INTERPRETATION: The previously reported difference in sperm counts between Finland and elsewhere in northwest Europe (including Britain) is probably not artefactual, suggesting that the reported world-wide decline in semen quality is also real. Reasons for the "Finnish exception" may include maternal smoking, which used to be lower in Finnish women than elsewhere, and which might affect developing make offspring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Comparative Studies; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; England; Europe; Examinations And Diagnoses; Fertility; Fertility Decline; Finland; Genitalia; Genitalia, Male; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Laboratory Procedures; Northern Europe; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Scandinavia; Semen; Seminal Vesicles; Sperm Count; Studies; United Kingdom; Urogenital System; Wales

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8684104     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90673-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  8 in total

1.  Reference limits: limited references in laboratories worldwide.

Authors:  Xue-Feng Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Is the human testis still an organ at risk?

Authors:  S Irvine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-22

Review 3.  [Environmental factors and male fertility].

Authors:  F-M Köhn; H C Schuppe
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Shedding light on the controversy surrounding the temporal decline in human sperm counts: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marcello Cocuzza; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-02

5.  Improved Fecundity in Northern China: A Secular Trend from 1980 to 2003.

Authors:  Xiaobing Tian; Jingmei Jiang; Jiedong Wang; Shucheng Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The combined fixed-dose antituberculous drugs alter some reproductive functions with oxidative stress involvement in wistar rats.

Authors:  O Awodele; A A Momoh; N A Awolola; O E Kale; W O Okunowo
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-07-19

7.  Semen quality pattern and age threshold: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 71,623 infertile men in China, between 2011 and 2017.

Authors:  W N Li; M M Jia; Y Q Peng; R Ding; L Q Fan; G Liu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Women's compliance with nutrition and lifestyle recommendations before pregnancy: general population cohort study.

Authors:  Hazel M Inskip; Sarah R Crozier; Keith M Godfrey; Sharon E Borland; Cyrus Cooper; Siân M Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-02-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.