Literature DB >> 8683634

A quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer.

R D Gelber1, A Goldhirsch, B F Cole, H S Wieand, G Schroeder, J E Krook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy after surgery, compared with postsurgical radiation therapy alone, has been shown to improve disease-free survival and overall survival significantly among patients with poor-prognosis (i.e., advanced stage disease or metastasis to regional lymph nodes) resectable rectal cancer. However, the combined therapy is associated with more toxic effects, raising the question of whether the benefits of the treatment justify its quality-of-life costs for the individual patient.
PURPOSE: To assess the trade-offs between improved survival and increased treatment toxicity, we reanalyzed data from a randomized clinical trial that compared the efficacy of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy with adjuvant radiation therapy alone in the treatment of patients with poor-prognosis resectable rectal cancer.
METHODS: The data were from a North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial in which 204 patients with poor-prognosis rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative radiation therapy alone or radiation therapy plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. A quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis was used to account for freedom from symptomatic disease and from early and late side effects of treatment. All reported P values are two-sided.
RESULTS: As reported previously, the combined therapy reduced the risk of relapse by 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12%-50%; P = .0016) and reduced the overall death rate by 29% (95% CI = 7%-45%; P = .025) in comparison with adjuvant radiation therapy alone. In the 5 years following assignment to treatment, patients who received the combined therapy had more time with toxicity (3.1 months; 95% CI = 2.0-4.1 months), shorter survival after relapse (3.6 months less; 95% CI = 0.9-6.3 months less), and more TWiST (6.1 months; 95% CI = 0.2-12.0 months) than patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy alone. Despite an increase in the amount of time that individuals spent with early and late toxic effects, the Q-TWiST analysis indicated that the combined therapy conferred significantly greater benefit for a wide range of patient preferences about living with the toxicity of treatment or the symptoms of overt disease. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Use of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy as an adjuvant to surgery for patients with poor-prognosis resectable rectal cancer is justified, since the improved outcome in terms of delayed recurrence and increased survival balances the time spent with early and late toxic effects. The Q-TWiST method is an excellent way to compare treatment outcomes that include quality-of-life considerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8683634     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.15.1039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  24 in total

Review 1.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Optimising treatment for resectable rectal cancer: is preoperative therapy beneficial?

Authors:  S Y Ngan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Evaluating toxicity in neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Höcht
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Evaluation of benefit-risk.

Authors:  Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Modelling and simulation in the development and use of anti-cancer agents: an underused tool?

Authors:  Ferdinand Rombout; Leon Aarons; Mats Karlsson; Anthony Man; France Mentré; Peter Nygren; Amy Racine; Hans Schaefer; Jean-Louis Steimer; Iñaki Troconiz; Achiel van Peer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Cost effectiveness of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Italian Cooperative Group for the Study of Meta-Analysis and the Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci.

Authors:  A Messori; S Trippoli; P Becagli; G Zaccara
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure.

Authors:  Sune Høirup Petersen; Henrik Harling; Lene Tschemerinsky Kirkeby; Peer Wille-Jørgensen; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

8.  Estimating global treatment toxicity burden from adverse-event data.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Dawn L Hershman; Jieling Miao; Xiaobo Zhong; Joseph M Unger; Ying Kuen Ken Cheung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Impact of a walking intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness, self-reported physical function, and pain in patients undergoing treatment for solid tumors.

Authors:  Kathleen Griffith; Jennifer Wenzel; JingJing Shang; Carol Thompson; Kerry Stewart; Victoria Mock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; David Feeny; Timothy L Hunt; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.