Literature DB >> 8683050

Benefits and use of digital prostheses.

B P Pereira1, A K Kour, E L Leow, R W Pho.   

Abstract

This study examines our clinical experience of fitting 136 digital prostheses in 90 patients. The careful selection of patients, especially concerning their expectations, is the single most important factor for successful prosthetic development for physically suitable candidates. Whether continued disability is due to physical loss or to its emotional impact, the socioeconomic consequences are similar, so attention to both is required. In a review of 30 patients fitted with digital prostheses after a minimum follow-up time of 2 years, it was found that 22 (73%) used their prostheses daily and another 7 (23%) used them intermittently according to the occasion. Thus, a total of 29 (97%) of those fitted with our digital prosthesis continued to use them after 2 years. Technical problems, such as loose fit and perspiration, resulted in 7 (23%) of the patients using the prostheses only occasionally. Fitting a prosthesis goes beyond aesthetics, and our study confirmed that digital prostheses, if of high quality, can alone or in conjunction with appropriate surgical reconstructions restore near normal appearance and form, substantially repair damaged body image, and simultaneously improve physical capability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8683050     DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80104-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  10 in total

1.  One- vs two stage surgery technique for implant placement in finger prosthesis.

Authors:  Pokpong Amornvit; Dinesh Rokaya; Konrawee Keawcharoen; Somchart Raucharernporn; Nimit Thongpulsawasdi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

2.  Comprehensive Rehabilitation of Partially Amputated Index Finger with Silicone Prosthesis: A Case Report with 3 years of Follow Up.

Authors:  Manawar Ahmad; Dhanasekar Balakrishnan; Aparna Narayan; Hina Naim
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-06-06

3.  Patient-specific prosthetic fingers by remote collaboration--a case study.

Authors:  John-John Cabibihan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Osseointegrated Metallic Implants for Finger Amputees: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Chiara Bregoli; Carlo Alberto Biffi; Kavin Morellato; Emanuele Gruppioni; Matteo Primavera; Michele Rampoldi; Mario Lando; Roberto Adani; Ausonio Tuissi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Rehabilitation of amputed thumb with a silicone prosthesis.

Authors:  Pooja Asnani; Chandu Giriyapura Shivalingappa; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Kirti Somkuwar; Faisal Khan
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

6.  Is the Prosthetic Homologue Necessary for Embodiment?

Authors:  Chelsea Dornfeld; Michelle Swanston; Joseph Cassella; Casey Beasley; Jacob Green; Yonatan Moshayev; Michael Wininger
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Rehabilitation of single finger amputation with customized silicone prosthesis.

Authors:  Niharika Yadav; Pooran Chand; Sunit Kumar Jurel
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

8.  Clinical intervention of a tighter-than-tolerated fit of aesthetic hand and finger prosthesis via controlled silicone swelling: A novel, speedier and versatile alternative method.

Authors:  Michael E L Leow; Lan Anh T Le; Yiong Huak Chan; Alphonsus K S Chong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  A functionally relevant tool for the body following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mariella Pazzaglia; Giulia Galli; Giorgio Scivoletto; Marco Molinari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Embodying functionally relevant action sounds in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mariella Pazzaglia; Giulia Galli; James W Lewis; Giorgio Scivoletto; Anna Maria Giannini; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.