Literature DB >> 8682741

Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.

J R Zarcone1, W W Fisher, C C Piazza.   

Abstract

Providing a short break contingent on completed work may increase responding through positive reinforcement (e.g., access to preferred activities) or negative reinforcement (e.g., escape form work). In this investigation, three analyses conducted with a boy with profound mental retardation showed that (a) a 20-s break increased responding more than a positive reinforcer (cola) did, and (b) the reinforcing effect of a 20-s break were affected by the availability of positive reinforcers during the break were affected by the availability of positive reinforcers during the break.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8682741      PMCID: PMC1279900          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  3 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Free-time as a reinforcer in the management of classroom behavior.

Authors:  J G Osborne
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

Review 3.  Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: an emerging technology.

Authors:  B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1987
  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.

Authors:  J W Harding; D P Wacker; W K Berg; L J Cooper; J Asmus; K Mlela; J Muller
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  On the distinction between positive and negative reinforcement.

Authors:  Brian A Iwata
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

3.  Evaluation of combined-antecedent variables on functional analysis results and treatment of problem behavior in a school setting.

Authors:  Danielle N Dolezal; Patricia F Kurtz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

4.  Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of "don't" (and symmetrical "do") requests.

Authors:  W W Fisher; J D Adelinis; R H Thompson; A S Worsdell; J R Zarcone
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

5.  The use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behavior.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; M L Remick; S A Contrucci; T L Aitken
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

6.  A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Allison Levy; Iser G DeLeon; Catherine K Martinez; Nathalie Fernandez; Nicholas A Gage; Sigurdur Óli Sigurdsson; Michelle A Frank-Crawford
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-10-14

7.  Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.

Authors:  Tiffany Kodak; Dorothea C Lerman; Valerie M Volkert; Nicole Trosclair
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

8.  An assessment of antecedent events influencing noncompliance in an outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Nathan A Call; David P Wacker; Joel E Ringdahl; Linda J Cooper-Brown; Eric W Boeiter
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.