Literature DB >> 8682737

A methodology for distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects associated with response blocking.

D C Lerman1, B A Iwata.   

Abstract

We present one method for distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects. The proportion of responses that produced a consequence (blocking) was varied while hand mouthing was treated in a man diagnosed with profound mental retardation. Response patterns across the schedule changes suggested that the blocking procedure functioned as a punishing event.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8682737      PMCID： PMC1279896          DOI： 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN： 0021-8855


  3 in total

1.  Reduction of self-injurious hand mouthing using response blocking.

Authors:  D H Reid; M B Parsons; J F Phillips; C W Green
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

2.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.

Authors:  B A Iwata; M F Dorsey; K J Slifer; K E Bauman; G S Richman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

3.  Protective equipment as treatment for stereotypic hand mouthing: sensory extinction or punishment effects?

Authors:  J L Mazaleski; B A Iwata; T A Rodgers; T R Vollmer; J R Zarcone
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994
  3 in total
  27 in total

1.  Response blocking with and without redirection for the treatment of pica.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; J D Adelinis
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Analysis of response covariationamong multiple topographies of food refusal.

Authors:  Bart M Sevin; Charles S Gulotta; Barbara J Sierp; Leigh A Rosica; Lorionna J Miller
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

3.  The effects of verbal operant training and response interruption and redirection on appropriate and inappropriate vocalizations.

Authors:  Candice L Colón; William H Ahearn; Kathleen M Clark; Jessica Masalsky
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

4.  Progressing from programmatic to discovery research: a case example with the overjustification effect.

Authors:  Henry S Roane; Wayne W Fisher; Erin M McDonough
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

5.  Collateral effects of response blocking during the treatment of stereotypic behavior.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Michael E Kelley; Christina M Vorndran; Carole M Van Camp
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

Review 6.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

7.  Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Iser G DeLeon; Vanessa Rodriguez-Catter; Kris M Keeney
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

8.  Differential reinforcement with and without blocking as treatment for elopement.

Authors:  Nathan A Call; Ryan S Pabico; Addie J Findley; Amber L Valentino
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

9.  Evaluation of response blocking and re-presentation in a competing stimulus assessment.

Authors:  Heather Jennett; Kathryn Jann; Louis P Hagopian
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

10.  The association for behavior analysis international position statement on restraint and seclusion.

Authors:  Timothy R Vollmer; Louis P Hagopian; Jon S Bailey; Michael F Dorsey; Gregory P Hanley; David Lennox; Mary M Riordan; Scott Spreat
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.