Literature DB >> 8681439

Cell proliferation and global methylation status changes in mouse liver after phenobarbital and/or choline-devoid, methionine-deficient diet administration.

J L Counts1, J I Sarmiento, M L Harbison, J C Downing, R M McClain, J L Goodman.   

Abstract

Our laboratory is testing the hypothesis that hypomethylation of DNA [a decreased content of 5-methylcytosine (5MeC) compared with cytosine] facilitates aberrant oncogene expression involved in tumorigenesis, using a model system of mouse strains with differing susceptibilities to liver tumorigenesis. The B6C3F1 (C57BL/6 x C3H/He) mouse serves as the relatively susceptible strain and C57BL/6 serves as the relatively resistant strain. Phenobarbital (PB) and/or administration of a choline-devoid, methionine-deficient diet (CMD) were employed as non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens. We have examined hepatocyte and nonhepatocyte proliferation in conjunction with an assessment of global methylation changes in liver DNA of B6C3F1 and C57BL/6 mice following these promoter treatments. Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation into DNA, used to measure cell proliferation indirectly, was visualized by immunohistochemistry and quantified by a Macintosh-based image analysis system. Increased hepatocyte proliferation was demonstrated following all three treatments. This increase was larger in C57BL/6 (the relatively resistant strain) as compared with B6C3F1. In contrast, global hypomethylation was evident to a larger extent in the B6C3F1 mouse, as compared with C57BL/6. PB led to hypomethylation (>20% decrease as compared with controls) at weeks 1, 2 and 4 in B6C3F1, but not in C57BL/6 at the same time points. CMD diet administration led to hypomethylation in both strains. At week 1, 21 and 9% decreases in global methylation status were observed in B6C3F1 and C57BL/6 respectively. Evaluation of these data suggests that the heightened sensitivity of the B6C3F1 mouse compared with the C57BL/6 is due, in part, to a decreased capacity for, or fidelity of, maintaining normal methylation status. The relatively resistant strain is better able to maintain the normal methylation status of DNA in the face of a higher level of cell proliferation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8681439     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/17.6.1251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  11 in total

1.  MCD diet-induced steatohepatitis is associated with alterations in asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and its transporters.

Authors:  Laura G Di Pasqua; Clarissa Berardo; Vittoria Rizzo; Plinio Richelmi; Anna Cleta Croce; Mariapia Vairetti; Andrea Ferrigno
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Epigenetics and its implications for ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Michiel B Vandegehuchte; Colin R Janssen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Effects of arsenic exposure on DNA methylation and epigenetic gene regulation.

Authors:  John F Reichard; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 4.  DNA methylation as a target for drug design.

Authors:  C M Bender; J M Zingg; P A Jones
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Multiple genes exhibit phenobarbital-induced constitutive active/androstane receptor-mediated DNA methylation changes during liver tumorigenesis and in liver tumors.

Authors:  Jennifer M Phillips; Jay I Goodman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Phenobarbital elicits unique, early changes in the expression of hepatic genes that affect critical pathways in tumor-prone B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  Jennifer M Phillips; Lyle D Burgoon; Jay I Goodman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  The constitutive active/androstane receptor facilitates unique phenobarbital-induced expression changes of genes involved in key pathways in precancerous liver and liver tumors.

Authors:  Jennifer M Phillips; Lyle D Burgoon; Jay I Goodman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  PIK3IP1, a negative regulator of PI3K, suppresses the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin He; Zhenqi Zhu; Carla Johnson; John Stoops; Amanda E Eaker; William Bowen; Marie C DeFrances
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Biological Basis of Differential Susceptibility to Hepatocarcinogenesis among Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Robert R Maronpot
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 1.628

Review 10.  The traditional toxicologic paradigm is correct: dose influences mechanism.

Authors:  J I Goodman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.