Literature DB >> 8678623

A prospective study of laparoscopic spinal fusion. Technique and operative complications.

D M Mahvi1, T A Zdeblick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors hypothesized that anterior transperitoneal laparoscopic interbody fusion was feasible and safe. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain associated with degenerative disc disease is optimally treated with distraction of the disc space and permanent fusion of the adjacent vertebral bodies. Exposure usually is obtained by a posterior muscle-splitting incision. Although the posterior approach is effective, the procedure results in significant debility secondary to the muscle splitting incision, a 4- to 6-day inpatient hospital stay, and the loss of employment for 3 to 6 months after the procedure.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with discogenic back pain were prospectively treated with laparoscopic anterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion. The anterior L5-S1 or L4-L5 disc spaces were exposed laparoscopically. Distraction of the disc space and fixation were achieved by insertion of a threaded titanium cage packed with cancellous bone.
RESULTS: Three technical complications occurred all in the first four patients and required two conversions to open transperitoneal fusion. Hospital stay for the patients treated by laparoscopic instrumentation and fusion averaged 1.7 days. Twelve of 20 patients reported excellent pain relief and returned to work in 3 to 8 weeks. No motion was identified in the 16 patients who obtained flexion extension radiographs at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transperitoneal anterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion is safe, and the early results are encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678623      PMCID: PMC1235251          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199607000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  DISTRACTION FUSION OF THE SPINE.

Authors:  H KNODT; R B LARRICK
Journal:  Ohio State Med J       Date:  1964-12

2.  Factors influencing the result of posterior spinal fusion in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J K Dowell; J M Powell; P J Webb; T R Morley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Postgraduate course on interventional laparoscopy. 1990 Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons. October 1990.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Spinal instrumentation in the treatment of severe progressive spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  P R Harrington; J H Dickson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; P M Steinberg; J S Ross; T J Masaryk; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Complications with the variable spinal plating system.

Authors:  T S Whitecloud; J C Butler; J L Cohen; P D Candelora
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Plating of thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar injuries with pedicle screw plates.

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; G Saillant; C Mazel
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Segmental spine plates with pedicle screw fixation. A new internal fixation device for disorders of the lumbar and thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  A D Steffee; R S Biscup; D J Sitkowski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D O Olsen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopic lateral L4-L5 disc exposure.

Authors:  F Brody; M Rosen; M Tarnoff; I Lieberman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sang Ki Chung; Sang Ho Lee; Sang Rak Lim; Dong-Yun Kim; Jee Soo Jang; Ki-Se Nam; Ho Yeon Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  L5-S1 laparoscopic anterior interbody fusion.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Tallal M Zeni; Frank M Phillips; Sameer Mathur; John G Zografakis; Ronald M Moore; Luis E Laguna
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.