Literature DB >> 8678574

A factual, not arbitrary, basis for choice of resection margins in melanoma.

M Piepkorn1, R L Barnhill.   

Abstract

Try as some might, it has proved exceedingly difficult to dispel the notion that primary melanoma should be treated by arbitrarily wide resection margins. There was never any substantive scientific foundation for the traditional 5-cm margin, but for much of this century it nevertheless found favor in medical folklore. Current opinions concerning melanoma management in the dermatologic literature, while careful to point out the limitations of supportive data, have continued the tradition of offering arbitrary guidelines for resection margins. The last 2 decades have witnessed the acquisition of sufficient experimental evidence to warrant further scrutiny of the practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  3 in total

1.  [Comment on the contribution by A. Hauschild et al.: "Safety margins in excision of primary malignant melanoma"].

Authors:  M Möhrle; H Breuninger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Surgical management of primary cutaneous melanomas of the hands and feet.

Authors:  J F Tseng; K K Tanabe; M A Gadd; A B Cosimi; R A Malt; F G Haluska; M C Mihm; A J Sober; W W Souba
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Histopathologic excision margin affects local recurrence rate: analysis of 2681 patients with melanomas < or =2 mm thick.

Authors:  J Gregory McKinnon; Emma C Starritt; Richard A Scolyer; William H McCarthy; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.