Literature DB >> 8677874

Value of the cardiovascular physical examination for detecting valvular heart disease in asymptomatic subjects.

C A Roldan1, B K Shively, M H Crawford.   

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of the cardiovascular physical examination for the diagnosis of asymptomatic valvular heart disease (VHD), we prospectively studied 143 subjects, 68 apparent normal subjects and 75 patients with diseases known to produce VHD. All subjects underwent a complete physical examination with dynamic cardiac auscultation by a physician blinded to clinical data and compared with the results of transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography (TEE). By TEE, 33 subjects (23%), and by physical examination, 25 subjects (17%) had at least 1 form of VHD. Despite a high frequency of mild valve abnormalities and a 31% prevalence of functional murmurs, the physical examination showed a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 98% (confidence interval = 0.51 to 0.84, and 0.94 to 0.99, respectively), and a positive and negative predictive value of 92% for the diagnosis of VHD. Only 2 of the 10 patients with VHD by TEE, but not by physical examination, had clinically important VHD. We conclude that the physical examination is a sensitive and highly specific method of screening for VHD in subjects without cardiac symptoms. Therefore, its use should be encouraged rather than the routine application of echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8677874     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00200-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  17 in total

1.  Using a multimedia tool to improve cardiac auscultation knowledge and skills.

Authors:  D T Stern; R S Mangrulkar; L D Gruppen; A L Lang; C M Grum; R D Judge
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Echocardiography or auscultation? How to evaluate systolic murmurs.

Authors:  Clarence Shub
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Ultrasound stethoscopy: a renaissance of the physical examination?

Authors:  J R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Simulation-guided cardiac auscultation improves medical students' clinical skills: the Pavia pilot experience.

Authors:  Stefano Perlini; Francesco Salinaro; Paola Santalucia; Francesco Musca
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jasminka M Vukanovic-Criley; Arsen Hovanesyan; Stuart Ross Criley; Thomas J Ryan; Gary Plotnick; Keith Mankowitz; C Richard Conti; John Michael Criley
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  Cardiac imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  W S Choo; R P Steeds
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Absolutely the last word on physical diagnosis: Not!

Authors:  Allen B Weisse
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2010-07

8.  Detection of heart disease by open access echocardiography: a retrospective analysis of general practice referrals.

Authors:  John Chambers; Saleha Kabir; Eric Cajeat
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Acute mitral regurgitation due to flail mitral leaflet mimicking: a diagnosis of pneumonia.

Authors:  Hikmet Yorgun; Uğur Canpolat; Kudret Aytemir; Pietro Amedeo Modesti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  E Etchells; V Glenns; S Shadowitz; C Bell; S Siu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.