Literature DB >> 8677400

Construction, validation and updating of a prognostic model for kidney graft survival.

H C Van Houwelingen1, J Thorogood.   

Abstract

The construction, validation and updating of a prognostic model for kidney graft survival is reported using data from the Eurotransplant database. First, a model is constructed for data from transplantations in the period 1984 to 1987. The model is later updated for the 1988 1990 data. The first data set was randomly split into a training set (two-thirds of the data) and a validation set (one-third). To prevent overfitting empirical Bayes estimation of the transplantation centre effect was employed. After that, the validation set was used for fine-tuning by shrinkage. For updating with the 1988 1990 data parametric models were used after suitable transformation of the time axis; it appeared that survival had slightly improved. This necessitated a correction of the parameters in the exponential model. Correctness of the model was checked by extension to a Weibull model. The lack of fit was statistically significant, but practically ignorable. Recommendations are made to place less emphasis on the selection of variables and cut-off points, and more emphasis on the fine-tuning of the prognostic model by means of low-dimensional parametric models in independent data sets.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8677400     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780141806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients.

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Karel G M Moons; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Yvonne Vergouwe
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Cost-effectiveness of recurrence risk guided care versus care as usual in women who suffered from early-onset preeclampsia including HELLP syndrome in their previous pregnancy (the PreCare study).

Authors:  Denise H J Delahaije; Sander M J van Kuijk; Carmen D Dirksen; Simone J S Sep; Louis L Peeters; Marc E Spaanderman; Hein W Bruinse; Laura D de Wit-Zuurendonk; Joris A M van der Post; Johannes J Duvekot; Jim van Eyck; Mariëlle G van Pampus; Mark A B H M van der Hoeven; Luc J Smits
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Multisite external validation of a risk prediction model for the diagnosis of blood stream infections in febrile pediatric oncology patients without severe neutropenia.

Authors:  Adam J Esbenshade; Zhiguo Zhao; Catherine Aftandilian; Raya Saab; Rachel L Wattier; Melissa Beauchemin; Tamara P Miller; Jennifer J Wilkes; Michael J Kelly; Alison Fernbach; Michael Jeng; Cindy L Schwartz; Christopher C Dvorak; Yu Shyr; Karl G M Moons; Maria-Luisa Sulis; Debra L Friedman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model.

Authors:  Walter Bouwmeester; Jos W R Twisk; Teus H Kappen; Wilton A van Klei; Karel G M Moons; Yvonne Vergouwe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  Systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-treatment of first unprovoked VTE.

Authors:  Joie Ensor; Richard D Riley; David Moore; Kym I E Snell; Susan Bayliss; David Fitzmaurice
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Dynamic models to predict health outcomes: current status and methodological challenges.

Authors:  David A Jenkins; Matthew Sperrin; Glen P Martin; Niels Peek
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2018-12-18

Review 9.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons; Danielle A van der Windt; Jill A Hayden; Pablo Perel; Sara Schroter; Richard D Riley; Harry Hemingway; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.