Literature DB >> 8677083

A randomized controlled trial of membrane stripping at term to promote labor.

B Wiriyasirivaj1, T Vutyavanich, R A Ruangsri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of membrane stripping at term to promote the onset of labor.
METHODS: One hundred twenty gravidas at 38 weeks' gestation, who were attending an antenatal clinic and planned to deliver at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai University Hospital in northern Thailand, were assigned randomly to one of two groups. One group had weekly pelvic examinations only, and the other also had membrane stripping, beginning at 38 weeks' gestation and continuing until the onset of labor or until 42 completed weeks' gestation. Outcome measures included the proportion of patients who delivered with 7 days after the first examination, Bishop scores among those who did not deliver, days from the first examination to delivery, incidence of postterm pregnancy, and maternal and fetal complication.
RESULTS: Twenty-five of 61 patients (41%) assigned to membrane stripping delivered within 1 week, compared with 12 of 59 controls (20.3%), a statistically significant difference (P = .014). There was also a statistically significant difference (P = .013, Mann-Whitney U test) in the Bishop scores among those who did not deliver within 1 week (4 +/- 2.5 versus 2.6 +/- 1.7 in the study and control groups, respectively). A significant difference was also observed with respect to the mean number of days to delivery (8.8 +/- 6.7 versus 13.6 +/- 7.5, respectively; P < .001). The incidence of postterm pregnancy was one of 61 (1.6%) and three of 59 (5.1%) in the stripping and control groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in maternal and fetal complications.
CONCLUSION: Membrane stripping is safe and effective in promoting the onset of labor at term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8677083     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00015-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  M Boulvain; C Stan; O Irion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

Review 2.  Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterina Mishanina; Ewelina Rogozinska; Tej Thatthi; Rehan Uddin-Khan; Khalid S Khan; Catherine Meads
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks.

Authors:  Kathleen Putnam; Everett F Magann; Dorota A Doherty; Aaron T Poole; Marcia I Magann; William B Warner; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-08-19

4.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  Elaine M Finucane; Deirdre J Murphy; Linda M Biesty; Gillian Ml Gyte; Amanda M Cotter; Ethel M Ryan; Michel Boulvain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

5.  A Secondary Analysis of the LILAC Study Regarding Cesarean Birth by Maternal Request in Women Living with HIV.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison
Journal:  J Womens Health Dev       Date:  2021-06-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.