Literature DB >> 8677078

Parametrial involvement, regardless of nodal status: a poor prognostic factor for cervical cancer.

T G Zreik1, J T Chambers, S K Chambers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of resection of central disease when the parametria are involved by tumor in high-risk stage I cervical cancer patients.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with high-risk stage I cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and had pathologic findings of positive lymph nodes (N = 13), positive parametria (N = 7), or both (N = 12) were identified retrospectively. The effects of various histopathologic findings on disease-free interval and survival were evaluated, including the effect of resection of central disease with and without positive nodal disease. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared with the log-rang test. Multivariate analyses using a stepwise regression model were performed.
RESULTS: Compared with other histologies, adenocarcinoma was associated with a significantly shorter disease-free interval (P = .037). Among patients with parametrial involvement lymph node status did not affect disease-free interval or survival. However, when patients with positive lymph nodes were examined, the additional finding of parametrial positivity significantly worsened both disease-free interval (P = .039) and survival (P = .036). When the 19 patients with positive parametria, regardless of lymph node status, were compared with those with positive lymph nodes alone, the former group had a significantly shorter disease-free interval (P = .038). The tumor recurred in 12 of these 19 patients; all cases involved the pelvis, with a median time to recurrence of 15 months. Multivariate analysis showed that adenocarcinoma histology (P = .038) and parametrial involvement (P = .043) were independent, poor prognostic indicators for disease-free interval.
CONCLUSION: Involvement of the parametria, regardless of lymph node status, and adenocarcinoma histology confer a poor prognosis in high-risk patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Caution should be used when contemplating resection of bulky tumors as part of primary therapy if the parametria appear to be involved by tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8677078     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00026-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of positive lymph node number in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Park; Jong Woon Bae
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-30

2.  Adjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced high-risk cervical cancer.

Authors:  F Heinzelmann; G Henke; M von Grafenstein; N Weidner; F Paulsen; A Staebler; S Brucker; M Bamberg; M Weinmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Early invasive cervical cancer: MRI and CT predictors of lymphatic metastases in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco A Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Mostafa Atri; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Laminin-5 is a biomarker of invasiveness in cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Johji Imura; Yoshiaki Uchida; Kazuhiro Nomoto; Kazuhito Ichikawa; Shigeki Tomita; Tatsuo Iijima; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  Evaluation of outcome and prognostic factors in 739 patients with uterine cervix carcinoma: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Fatma Teke; Adnan Yöney; Memik Teke; Gültekin Adanaş; Zuhat Urakçı; Gül Türkcü; Bekir Eren; Ali İnal; Mustafa Ünsal
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015-05-13

6.  Prognostic analysis of uterine cervical cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy: importance of positive or close parametrial resection margin.

Authors:  Yi-Jun Kim; Kyung-Ja Lee; Kyung Ran Park; Jiyoung Kim; Wonguen Jung; Rena Lee; Seung Cheol Kim; Hye Sung Moon; Woong Ju; Yun Hwan Kim; Jihae Lee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Long-term results of early adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk, early stage uterine cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sang-Won Kim; Mison Chun; Hee-Sug Ryu; Suk-Joon Chang; Tae Wook Kong; Young-Taek Oh; Seung Hee Kang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Class I versus Class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1 (tumor ≤ 2 cm) cervical cancer: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Chun-Liang Shang; Qi-Qiao Du; Di Wu; Yan-Chun Liang; Tian-Yu Liu; Jia-Ming Huang; Shu-Zhong Yao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Prediction of 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy using computational intelligence methods.

Authors:  Bogdan Obrzut; Maciej Kusy; Andrzej Semczuk; Marzanna Obrzut; Jacek Kluska
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Vaginal cuff length during radical hysterectomy is a prognostic factor for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Na Zuo; Hongzhen Hu; Niresh Thapa; Zhen Li; Daqiong Jiang; Xiangyu Meng; Jing Yang; Xiaoxing Chen; Hongbing Cai
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.