Literature DB >> 8677060

The preterm prediction study: fetal fibronectin testing and spontaneous preterm birth. NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network.

R L Goldenberg1, B M Mercer, P J Meis, R L Copper, A Das, D McNellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of fetal fibronectin in the cervix and vagina as a screening test for spontaneous preterm birth.
METHODS: Two thousand nine hundred twenty-nine women at ten centers were routinely screened every 2 weeks from 22-24 to 30 weeks for cervical and vaginal fetal fibronectin. A positive test was defined as a value equal to or greater than 50 ng/mL. The relation between a positive test at four gestational ages and spontaneous preterm birth at various intervals after the test was determined.
RESULTS: In each testing period, 3-4% of the fetal fibronectin tests were positive. The correlation between cervical and vaginal fetal fibronectin at the same visit was always approximately 0.7 (P < .001), and that between cervical or vaginal fetal fibronectin in consecutive visits was between 0.17 and 0.25 (P < .001). The sensitivity of fetal fibronectin at 22-24 weeks to predict spontaneous preterm birth at less than 28 weeks was 0.63, and the relative risk for a positive versus negative test was 59. The specificity was always 96-98%, whereas the positive predictive value rose from 13% to 36% as the upper limit of the definition of preterm birth was increased from less than 28 to less than 37 weeks. The relative risk for spontaneous preterm birth after a positive fetal fibronectin test compared with a negative fetal fibronectin test varied substantially by testing period and by the definition of spontaneous preterm birth, but always remained greater than 4 and statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: A positive cervical or vaginal fetal fibronectin test at 22-24 weeks predicted more than half of the spontaneous preterm births at less than 28 weeks (sensitivity 0.63). As the definition of spontaneous preterm birth was extended to include later gestational ages or when the fetal fibronectin test was performed later in pregnancy, the level of association between a positive fetal fibronectin test and spontaneous preterm birth, while remaining highly significant, tended to decrease. Although fetal fibronectin is an excellent test for predicting spontaneous preterm birth, we present no evidence that the use of this test will result in a reduction in spontaneous preterm birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8677060     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00035-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  28 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: obstetrics.

Authors:  J M Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-01

2.  Predicting spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  David F Colombo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

Review 3.  Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review.

Authors:  Honest Honest; Lucas M Bachmann; Janesh K Gupta; Jos Kleijnen; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

4.  Interleukin 6 and fetal fibronectin as a predictors of preterm delivery in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Marija Hadzi Lega; Ana Daneva Markova; Milan Stefanovic; Mile Tanturovski
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 5.  Recurrent preterm birth.

Authors:  Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Beth L Pineles; Francesca Gotsch; Pooja Mittal; Nandor Gabor Than; Jimmy Espinoza; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  The utility of fetal fibronectin in the prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Daniel G Kiefer; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

7.  Noninvasive diagnosis of intraamniotic infection: proteomic biomarkers in vaginal fluid.

Authors:  Jane Hitti; Jodi A Lapidus; Xinfang Lu; Ashok P Reddy; Thomas Jacob; Surendra Dasari; David A Eschenbach; Michael G Gravett; Srinivasa R Nagalla
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Management of pregnancies with cervical shortening: a very short cervix is a very big problem.

Authors:  Hee Joong Lee; Tae Chul Park; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

9.  A high concentration of fetal fibronectin in cervical secretions increases the risk of intra-amniotic infection and inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.

Authors:  Kyung Joon Oh; Roberto Romero; Jee Yoon Park; Jihyun Kang; Joon-Seok Hong; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.901

10.  Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis.

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; Anthony O Odibo; Aaron B Caughey; David M Stamilio; Sonia S Hassan; George A Macones; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.