Literature DB >> 8676739

Approximate methods for estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution and the variation of substitution rates among sites.

Z Yang1, S Kumar.   

Abstract

We propose two approximate methods (one based on parsimony and one on pairwise sequence comparison) for estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution and a parsimony-based method for estimating the gamma parameter for variable substitution rates among sites. The matrix of substitution rates that represents the substitution pattern can be recovered through its relationship with the observable matrix of site pattern frequences in pairwise sequence comparisons. In the parsimony approach, the ancestral sequences reconstructed by the parsimony algorithm were used, and the two sequences compared are those at the ends of a branch in the phylogenetic tree. The method for estimating the gamma parameter was based on a reinterpretation of the numbers of changes at sites inferred by parsimony. Three data sets were analyzed to examine the utility of the approximate methods compared with the more reliable likelihood methods. The new methods for estimating the substitution pattern were found to produce estimates quite similar to those obtained from the likelihood analyses. The new method for estimating the gamma parameter was effective in reducing the bias in conventional parsimony estimates, although it also overestimated the parameter. The approximate methods are computationally very fast and appear useful for analyzing large data sets, for which use of the likelihood method requires excessive computation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8676739     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  32 in total

1.  A novel method for estimating substitution rate variation among sites in a large dataset of homologous DNA sequences.

Authors:  G Pesole; C Saccone
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inference of functional regions in proteins by quantification of evolutionary constraints.

Authors:  Alexander L Simon; Eric A Stone; Arend Sidow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  M H Schierup; J Hein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evidence for mitochondrial DNA recombination in a human population of island Melanesia.

Authors:  E Hagelberg; N Goldman; P Lió; S Whelan; W Schiefenhövel; J B Clegg; D K Bowden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The fingerprint of phantom mutations in mitochondrial DNA data.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt; Lluís Quintana-Murci; Antonio Salas; Vincent Macaulay
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Mutation rate variation at human dinucleotide microsatellites.

Authors:  Hongyan Xu; Ranajit Chakraborty; Yun-Xin Fu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Modulation of base-specific mutation and recombination rates enables functional adaptation within the context of the genetic code.

Authors:  Taison Tan; Leonard D Bogarad; Michael W Deem
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Evolution of structural shape in bacterial globin-related proteins.

Authors:  Lorraine Marsh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Site-specific evolutionary rates in proteins are better modeled as non-independent and strictly relative.

Authors:  Andrew D Fernandes; William R Atchley
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Using non-homogeneous models of nucleotide substitution to identify host shift events: application to the origin of the 1918 'Spanish' influenza pandemic virus.

Authors:  Mario dos Reis; Alan J Hay; Richard A Goldstein
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.